We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 7,064

Motion to stay pending inter partes review denied where the claim construction hearing had already occurred

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 19 2013

Defendant Omron Oilfield & Marine, Inc. ("Omron") filed a motion to stay pending an Inter Partes Review that it initiated against Plaintiff's

U.S. Supreme Court holds that “reverse payment” patent litigation settlements are not immune from antitrust review

  • Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • June 19 2013

In a significant ruling involving both intellectual property rights and competition policy, the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5-3

U.S. International Trade Commission grants injunctive relief on standard essential patent

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 19 2013

The U.S. International Trade Commission has issued an exclusion order barring importation of certain older model Apple products for infringing a

Stays of litigation and ITC investigations pending IPRs

  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 19 2013

District courts have ruled on a number of motions to stay litigation pending inter partes review ("IPR"), granting at least five unopposed, joint

Supreme Court revives FTC reverse payment challenge; says agreements can violate antitrust laws

  • Williams Mullen
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued one of its more anticipated rulings of this term in a decision that aims squarely at the intersection of antitrust

Update: are the regulators coming for the patent trolls?

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

We recently wrote about a workshop held by the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission to discuss perceived abuses by patent

Supreme Court holds that "reverse payment" patent settlements are subject to potential antitrust condemnation, but only after full-blown rule of reason review

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

In FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. ____ (Slip Op. June 17, 2013), the Supreme Court addressed for the first time the underlying antitrust merits of the

U.S. Supreme Court rules that ‘reverse payments’ in Hatch-Waxman litigation settlement agreements must be scrutinized under antitrust laws

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 53 decision in FTC v. Actavis.1 The Court reversed an 11th Circuit decision

Supreme Court permits anti-trust scrutiny of “pay for delay” settlements

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

The Court has held that so-called "reverse payment" or "pay for delay" settlement agreements used between brand name drug makers and their generic

The Supreme Court heightens antitrust scrutiny for ANDA reverse payment agreements between pharmaceutical companies

  • Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 18 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday ruled on the long-awaited FTC v. Actavis case concerning ANDA reverse payments, resolving a sharp circuit split. The

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy