We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-8 of 8

Religious institutions update

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 6 2012

Although the most significant changes for large employers are still to come, implementation of the Patent Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Public Law 111-148) is in full swing

Religious institutions: August 2012 update

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 16 2012

In the 1990s, plaintiffs brought clergy malpractice and professional negligence claims against ministers, churches and denominations

First Amendment precludes inquiry into misappropriation of church funds

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2012

In Askew v. T’ees of the General Assembly of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith, Inc., Case No. 11-1916, 2012 WL 2433497 (3d Cir. June 28, 2012), the Third Circuit held that the non-entanglement principle embedded in the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment prevented it from deciding whether a church and its officials were misappropriating church funds for personal use, breaching their fiduciary duty to the church, and failing to submit annual financial statements to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Compelled pregnancy-related speech struck

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2012

In Greater Baltimore Ctr. for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. 11-1111, 11-1885, 2012 WL 2402573 (4th Cir. June 27, 2012), the court ruled an ordinance unconstitutional that required any provider of pregnancy-related services that did not also provide or refer its clients for abortions or certain birth-control services (e.g., crisis pregnancy centers) to post a conspicuous sign in its waiting room to that effect

RLUIPA claim of home Bible study plaintiffs dismissed

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2012

In Salman v. City of Phoenix, Case No. CV 12-1219-PHX-JAT, 2012 WL 2261118 (D. Ariz. June 15, 2012), the court dismissed, based on the doctrine of res judicata and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the plaintiffs’ RLUIPA and Arizona Freedom of Religious Exercise Act (RFRA) claims related to their multiple convictions for holding weekly Bible studies on their property in violation of the zoning code

Timely topics

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2012

As we begin a new year it is valuable to consider the lessons of 2011 for religious institutions

Religious institutions: October 2010 update

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 8 2010

As we head toward the 2010 midterm elections in November, tax-exempt organizations must be aware of the limitations regarding lobbying and political activity

Silence is golden for local development agency

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2010

Local government has to let you in the door, but they don't have to let you speak, according to a Florida appeals court's interpretation of the state open meetings law