We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 56

A review of the LIBOR scandal: a unique case with no end in sight

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • March 11 2013

On June 27, 2012, when Barclays Bank PLC made international headlines for its $453 million settlement with the U.S. and UK authorities for its role

What matters: A review of 2011 and 2012

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

As you know, the last two years have seen a somewhat improved, but by no means robust, business climate. At the same time, structural shifts in the

Where (and what) is the harm?

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2013

The recent LIBOR suppression scandal has given rise to numerous lawsuits, both individual and putative class actions based on several theories of

VisaMasterCard interchange settlement permits merchants to impose surcharges under certain circumstances

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 20 2013

Preliminary approval to the $7.25 billion class action interchange was granted in November, 2012, providing for a $6.05 billion fund, a temporary

Banks shed LIBOR antitrust claims

  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2013

On March 29, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the antitrust claims brought by plaintiffs in numerous

Antitrust division enters into first Deferred Prosecution Agreement

  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 14 2013

In a first for the Department of Justice ("DOJ") Antitrust Division, the Division entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement ("DPA") with Royal

2012 payments systems year-in-review

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 27 2012

The interchange fee and the potential of mobile payments were the dominant payment system issues in 2012. From a landmark antitrust settlement to

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of antitrust action by atm cardholders due to lack of standing

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and held that automated teller machine (“ATM”) cardholders lacked standing to bring an antitrust class action against banks and former and current corporate owner-operators of the ATM network for horizontal price fixing of certain fees paid when cardholders retrieved cash from ATMs not owned by their banks

Banks get a boost in US Libor case

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

On 29 March 2013, US Federal District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald handed down a 161 page judgment dismissing a significant proportion of the class

Ninth Circuit on high-low postings: National Bank Act preempts California’s Unfair Competition Law as to transaction posting practices but not as to misrepresentation of transaction posting methods

  • Dykema Gossett PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 2 2013

In Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 6684748 (9th Cir. Dec 26, 2012), the Ninth Circuit has recently held that the federal National Bank