We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 206

Financial services report winter 2014

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 18 2014

The election is over, but we are still reeling from the aftermath of the November shock. We’re talking of course about North Korean Supreme Leader

Cybersecurity: some holiday cheer for the service and retail industry

  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 15 2014

Last week, from Chicago came a little bit of holiday cheer and good tidings for P.F. Chang's China Bistro when the District Court dismissed two class

Financial institutions’ claims in data breach litigation survive Target’s motion to dismiss

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 15 2014

In a much anticipated decision, a United States District Court in Minnesota denied Target's attempt to dismiss financial institutions' putative class

Glassine window spells trouble for debt collector

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 12 2014

Based on an August 28, 2014 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Douglass v. Convergent Outsourcing fka ER Solutions, Inc

Federal court finds retailer may owe banks a duty to protect consumers’ financial information

  • Quarles & Brady LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 12 2014

Last week, a Minnesota federal court ruled that a retailer (here, Target) may owe its customers' banks a duty to keep the customers' financial

Attention retailers: target data breach ruling finds duty owed to issuer banks

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 11 2014

The Court hearing the Target data security breach litigation issued a ruling on December 2, 2014, largely denying Target's motion to dismiss the

Card issuers are foreseeable victim in Target data breach cases

  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 10 2014

In an important decision on standing in data breach cases, the United States District Court in Minnesota issued an Order last week denying Target's

Retailers face a new front of cybersecurity litigation on behalf of financial institutions

  • Dykema Gossett PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 10 2014

On December 2, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss a class action

Issuing banks’ claims against Target allowed to proceed

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 10 2014

A federal court has denied Target Corporation's motion to dismiss class action claims brought against it by issuing banks. The banks are seeking

Court allows financial institutions to proceed with data breach class action against target

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 8 2014

On December 2, 2014, a U.S. District Court in Minnesota ruled that a group of banks and other financial institutions (collectively, "FIs") could