Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 41

Wellness plans and the ADA safe harbor: Seff v. Broward revisited

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
August 22 2012

Many plan sponsors are unaware of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act as it relates to health insurance

Be careful who you pay: mistakes may make you pay twice

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
December 2 2011

Plan administrators have to be careful about making sure they pay the correct beneficiaries and pay the correct amount

Withdrawal liability must be actuary's "best estimate"

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
September 18 2012

When dealing with withdrawal liability, employers frequently question how it is calculated and the answer is usually "by an actuary."

Breach of fiduciary duty claims don't automatically create individual remedies

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
January 14 2013

When the Supreme Court decides not to take a case, that is generally not news. But in the case of the Court's decision to decline a review of Walker

Protecting participants from themselves: the choice is theirs

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
July 24 2012

I recently spoke at a seminar where the question was raised about a plan sponsor's obligations to act where they see a participant has made foolish investment choices in their self-directed accounts

Winning isn't everything: attorneys fees in ERISA cases

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
June 1 2010

The award of attorneys fees under Section 502(g) of ERISA (29 USC 1132(g)) is a pretty misunderstood concept

Not everyone is a fiduciary

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
August 2 2010

Just because you work with retirement plan money, you are not necessarily a fiduciary

Supreme Court upholds deferential review for plan administrators

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
April 22 2010

Some things did happen this week that had nothing to do with health care reform or COBRA

Trustees, beware of conflicts: Glenn applies to Taft-Hartley plans

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
July 12 2010

You might recall from a previous posting that I discussed the Supreme Court's decision in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Glenn

Health care reform is unconstitutional, sort-of, at least maybe.

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
December 13 2010

Before everyone gets excited about engaging in an argument about the constitutionality of health care reform and debating the various cases that are pending on the topic, understand this is not what this posting is about