We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 17

Shaking down the thunder from the sky: Notre Dame’s challenge to the contraception mandate

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The Supreme Court will inevitably decide to what extent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act protects religiously affiliated employers from

Same-sex domestic partner policy does not discriminate against opposite-sex couples

  • Hodgson Russ LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2011

Reversing a decision by the Westchester County Human Rights Commission, a New York appeals court recently held that a policy adopted by a local Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) to offer health care to same-sex domestic partners did not unlawfully discriminate against opposite-sex domestic partners

US Supreme Court’s decision on Obamacare could impact shared spending in Canada

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld the Constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, being health care legislation commonly referred to as “Obamacare”

Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of Affordable Care Act

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

In perhaps the most widely anticipated Supreme Court decision since Bush v. Gore in 2000, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) was upheld on Thursday in a narrow 5 to 4 decision

Supreme Court decision on the Affordable Care Act

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

On June 28, the much-anticipated decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius was released by the Supreme Court

CalPERS suffers standing setback in spiking suit

  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2012

Last Friday, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Michael P. Kenny ruled on demurrers to a petition for a writ of mandamus filed against the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees Retirement System, California Prison Healthcare Receivership Corporation, Judicial Council of California-Administrative Ofice of the Courts, and J. Clark Kelso

Bill renewing Trade Adjustment Assistance Program ready for president's signature

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2011

On October 12 the House by a 307-122 margin approved a measure that temporarily and retroactively extends the Trade Adjustment Assistance program that was enacted as part of the 2009 stimulus package and expired in February 2011

More on summary of benefits coverage: FAQ part 8

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 23 2012

In case you missed it, the Supreme Court is hearing arguments next week on the constitutional challenges to health care reform

Arizona must continue offering benefits to same-sex partners of state employees

  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2011

Last Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit upheld an injunction that blocked an Arizona law that would have eliminated health care benefits for same-sex partners of state employees

Connecticut governor vetoes bill establishing the Connecticut Healthcare Partnership

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 24 2008

Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell recently vetoed House Bill 5536, An Act Establishing the Connecticut Healthcare Partnership (the "Bill"), which is intended to achieve savings for Connecticut municipalities, nonprofit groups and small employers with 50 employees or less by allowing them to join the current state employees' health insurance program