Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 78

Discounted stock options subject to Section 409A penalties

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

Ruling in favor of the IRS, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims confirmed in a recent case that discounted stock options are deferred compensation

Now is the time to "pay or play"

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

Now is the Time to "Play or Pay." The so-called play-or-pay mandate becomes effective January 1, 2014. For calendar year plans, 2014 open enrollment

Acquired employees were properly denied shutdown benefits

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
May 31 2012

Acquisitions and the offer of transition benefits for acquired employees under a seller’s plans can be tricky

IRS clarifies treatment of dividends and dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock and restricted stock units under section 162(m)

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
August 29 2012

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 162(m) generally prohibits a publicly traded corporation from deducting compensation paid to “covered employees” in excess of $1 million per year

Second Circuit revisits application of Moench presumption

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

"What does the plan document say?," is a popular refrain heard from ERISA attorneys. That, it turns out, is the same question the Second Circuit

Court denies ERISA claims involving a plan sponsor’s imprudent investment decisions

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
March 29 2013

A group of participants in the Bank of America (BOA) 401(k) and pension plans commenced a lawsuit alleging BOA engaged in prohibited transactions and

Rental property sufficient to find personal liability for multiemployer plan withdrawal

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
April 30 2013

Messina Trucking was a contributing employer to the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund. In October 2007, Messina Trucking

Short-term second spouse prevails as beneficiary over children from prior marriage

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
February 28 2012

This dispute stems from a common scenario: a 401(k) plan participant names his children from a prior marriage as his beneficiaries, remarries without changing his beneficiary designation, then dies, resulting in a predictable battle between the second wife and the deceased participant’s children over entitlement to the participant’s plan benefits

‘Full and fair’ ERISA review required for top-hat plan claim

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
February 28 2012

An executive who was denied severance and incentive award benefits after she resigned for “good reason” following a company merger may pursue her claim for benefits under a Massachusetts district court ruling that the plan administrator failed to provide a full and fair review of her claim, as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA

Court holds that plan may recoup overpayment of pension benefits

Hodgson Russ LLP
-
USA
-
February 28 2012

The district court for the District of Massachusetts held that a multiemployer pension plan may recoup the overpayment of benefits, notwithstanding the participant’s intervening bankruptcy

next >