We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 41

Is there no limit to who can be sued under ERISA?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 1 2011

Service providers beware!

Trustees, beware of conflicts: Glenn applies to Taft-Hartley plans

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 12 2010

You might recall from a previous posting that I discussed the Supreme Court's decision in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Glenn

Winning isn't everything: attorneys fees in ERISA cases

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2010

The award of attorneys fees under Section 502(g) of ERISA (29 USC 1132(g)) is a pretty misunderstood concept

Supreme Court upholds deferential review for plan administrators

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 22 2010

Some things did happen this week that had nothing to do with health care reform or COBRA

Not everyone is a fiduciary

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 2 2010

Just because you work with retirement plan money, you are not necessarily a fiduciary

Supreme court looks at deficient plan communications: fiduciaries beware?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2010

In the past, I have written about the importance of including accurate language in summary plan descriptions and how significant it is for plan sponsors to include appropriate "discretionary authority" language and "reservation of rights" provisions in plan documents

Health care reform is unconstitutional, sort-of, at least maybe.

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 13 2010

Before everyone gets excited about engaging in an argument about the constitutionality of health care reform and debating the various cases that are pending on the topic, understand this is not what this posting is about

Supreme Court finds medical students are employees for FICA purposes

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 19 2011

In January 11, the Supreme Court ruled Jan. 11 that medical students training to be residents are employees, and not students, and therefore subject to Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes (Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States, U.S., No. 09-837, 11111

Shareholder personally liable for "delinquent contributions"

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 31 2011

In some prior entries, I have made reference to the obligations of employers to make contributions to their own benefit plans and the obligation to make contributions to a multiemployer benefit plan

PPACA is unconstitutional and 1099 reporting may go away (a rough week for reform)

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 7 2011

Last week was a particularly rough week for health care reform as PPACA took some serious hits