Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 108

Courts OK discounted subsidies for branded prescription drugs

Husch Blackwell LLP
-
USA
-
June 12 2013

In recent months, two federal courts have dismissed lawsuits alleging that branded drug manufacturers' discounted subsidiescoverage of

Courts issue contrary rulings re statements touting compliance program

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
June 5 2013

Two district courts recently reached different conclusions regarding whether investors may proceed on a securities fraud claim based in part on

2012 year-end False Claims Act update

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
-
USA
-
January 8 2013

For years, the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has sought recoveries under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729-33 (the "FCA" or the "Act"), with a torrid

Important court decision for no-fault insurers: federal court rejects limitation on State Farm v. Mallela

Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
-
USA
-
January 9 2013

Specifically, on January 7, 2013, in the case of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Elzanaty, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York

MoFo Tech: SpringSummer 2013

Morrison & Foerster LLP
-
USA
-
May 22 2013

Behind every trend are new complications. And, often, laws trying to flatten the wrinkles the trends have wrought. Look at social media, for example

Jury ruled in Tuomey Healthcare retrial that the hospital violated the Stark Law and False Claims Act

King & Spalding LLP
-
USA
-
May 13 2013

On May 8, 2013, a jury concluded that Tuomey Healthcare System, Inc. (Tuomey), a community hospital in Sumter, S.C., violated the Stark Law for

Health care enforcement: 2012 trends: quarterly review Part IV in a continuing series on health care enforcement

Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
-
USA
-
May 8 2012

Mintz Levin’s Health Care Fraud Enforcement Defense group has published a series of “Year in Review” articles discussing its observations about health care fraud enforcement trends in 2011 and its opinions as to what these trends might mean for 2012

Tuomey violates Stark Law and False Claims Act through physician employment agreements

Barnes & Thornburg LLP
-
USA
-
May 13 2013

After a retrial, a federal jury found South Carolina-based 242-bed Tuomey Healthcare System (Tuomey) guilty last week of violating the Stark Law and

Amphastar’s qui tam suit against Aventis shows importance of patents

Fish & Richardson PC
-
USA
-
May 3 2013

In a recent ground-breaking qui tam ruling, a California federal court denied Aventis Pharma's (a division of Sanofi-Aventis) efforts to dismiss

Guilt by position: re-emergence of the responsible corporate officer doctrine

McGuireWoods LLP
-
USA
-
May 16 2012

In recent years, the federal government has made no secret of its intent to pursue individuals in addition to companies in its efforts to enforce healthcare-related statutes, rules and regulations

next >

Search results

Courts OK discounted subsidies for branded prescription drugs

Courts issue contrary rulings re statements touting compliance program

2012 year-end False Claims Act update

Important court decision for no-fault insurers: federal court rejects limitation on State Farm v. Mallela

MoFo Tech: SpringSummer 2013

Jury ruled in Tuomey Healthcare retrial that the hospital violated the Stark Law and False Claims Act

Health care enforcement: 2012 trends: quarterly review Part IV in a continuing series on health care enforcement

Tuomey violates Stark Law and False Claims Act through physician employment agreements

Amphastar’s qui tam suit against Aventis shows importance of patents

Guilt by position: re-emergence of the responsible corporate officer doctrine

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea