Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 18

ALJ Essex grants motions to terminate investigation as to camus and sidney frank in Certain Products Having Laminated Packaging (337-TA-874)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
May 16 2013

On May 8, 2013, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued the public version of Order No. 10 and Order No. 11 (both dated May 7, 2013) in Certain Products Having

ALJ Essex grants joint motion to terminate investigation in Certain Consumer Electronics And Display Devices (337-TA-836)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
January 30 2013

On January 28, 2013, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued the public version of Order No. 30 in Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products

ALJ Rogers denies motion for summary determination in Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans For Use In Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances (337-TA-833)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
January 23 2013

On January 15, 2013, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. Issued Order No. 22 in Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans For Use In Making

ALJ Rogers rules on motion to preclude certain invalidity defenses in Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans for use in Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment appliances (337-TA-833)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
January 18 2013

On January 10, 2013, ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. Issued Order No. 19 denying Complainant Align Technology, Inc.'s ("Align") motion to preclude certain

ALJ Gildea grants motions to terminate investigation in Certain Blu-Ray Disc Players (337-TA-824)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
December 20 2012

On December 10, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order Nos. 38, 39, and 40 in Certain Blu-Ray Disc Players, Components Thereof and Products Containing

ALJ Gildea rules on motions in limine in Certain Portable Electronic Devices (337-TA-797)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
August 27 2012

On August 17, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public versions of Order No. 60 (dated July 26, 2012), Order No. 62 (dated July 30, 2012), and Order No. 67 (dated August 2, 2012) regarding various motions in limine filed by Complainant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-797

ITC issues public version of opinion in certain mobile telephones and wireless communication devices featuring digital cameras (337-TA-703)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
August 17 2012

Further to our July 23, 2012 post, on August 10, 2012, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion finding no violation of Section 337 in Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless Communication Devices Featuring Digital Cameras, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-703

ALJ Pender denies motion for non-monetary sanctions in Certain Dimmable Compact Fluorescent Bulbs (337-TA-830)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
August 10 2012

On July 30, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 10 denying Complainants’ Neptun Light, Inc. and Andrzej Bobel (collectively, “Complainants”) motion for non-monetary sanctions against Respondents U Lighting America, Inc. (“ULA”) and Feit Electric Company (“Feit”) in Certain Dimmable Compact Fluorescent Lamps and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-830

ALJ Pender denies motion to quash in certain computing devices with associated instruction sets and software (337-TA-812)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
August 1 2012

On July 24, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 9 in Certain Computing Devices With Associated Instruction Sets And Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-812) denying non-party ARM, Inc.’s (“ARM”) motion to quash or limit a subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum served upon it by Complainants VIA Technologies, Inc., IP-First, LLC, and Centaur Technology, Inc. (collectively, “VIA”

ITC issues public version of opinion finding violation and issuing a limited exclusion order against Motorola in Certain Mobile Devices (337-TA-744)

Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP
-
USA
-
June 18 2012

Further to our May 22, 2012 post, on June 5, 2012, the International Trade Commission (“the Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion finding a violation of Section 337 and issuing a limited exclusion order in Certain Mobile Devices, Associated Software, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-744