Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-7 of 7
ALJ orders eight respondents to show cause to avoid default in Inv. no. 337-TA-780
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- September 12 2011
ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued an order on September 9, 2011 directing certain Respondents to show cause why they should not be found in default by the close of business on September 23, 2011, in Certain Protective Cases and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-780
New complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- June 2 2011
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed a letter on June 1, 2011, requesting the International Trade Commission to conduct an investigation under section 337 covering Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Containing Same
ALJ Rogers issues order denying motion to compel inspection
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- May 26 2011
On May 25, ALJ Rogers issued the public version of his order denying Complainants Thomson Licensing SAS's motion to compel Respondents to provide Complainants' counsel and technical experts with access to Respondents' manufacturing facilities to conduct inspections
New complaint filed by Sony
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- February 10 2011
Sony Corporation filed a letter on February 9, 2011, requesting that the International Trade Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 covering Certain Display Devices Including Digital Televisions and Monitors
Procedural schedule set in Investigation No. 337-TA-755
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- February 10 2011
On February 10, 2011, ALJ Rogers issued an order setting the procedural schedule and target date in Investigation No. 337-TA-755, In the Matter of Certain Starter Motors and Alternators
Tariff Act does not require that mark owner make the product in question
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- October 31 2008
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that a company that imports a product bearing a counterfeit mark can be liable for penalties under federal law (the Tariff Act) even if the owner of the mark in question does not make the product in question
Safe harbor applies to ITC action based on foreign practice of patent process
- McDermott Will & Emery
- -
- USA
- -
- April 28 2008
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the International Trade Commission’s (ITC) ruling that the safe harbor statute applies in proceedings under the Tariff Act relating to process patents, as well as product patents, for imported products that are used for the exempt purposes of 271(e)(1
Current Search
- Jurisdiction - USA
- Workarea - Trade & Customs
- Workarea - Intellectual Property
- Firm Name - McDermott Will & Emery