We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 121

BYOD ruling requires employers to reimburse for work-related calls

  • Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2014

How will BYOD other than cell phones be impacted by a California court ruling that "when employees must use their personal cell phones for

Hold the line: employers on the hook for “reasonable percentage” of personal cell phone expenses if employee uses phone for work

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device ("BYOD") policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. Schwan's Home

Court orders Schwan’s to reimburse work-related use of personal cell phones

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 15 2014

A California appeals court has determined that the state Labor Code requires employers to reimburse employees who "must use their personal cell

OSHA updates cell tower directive

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2014

OSHA has issued a directive outlining the proper use of hoist and other fall arrest systems. The directive, released on July 17, 2014, includes

Riley v. California advances individual privacy rights in this digital age

  • Pierce Atwood LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

Employee privacy rights may have received a boost from the U.S. Supreme Court at the end of this year's term. In Riley v. California, the most recent

Supreme Court decision in Riley affects cellphone searches in civil litigation, employment matters

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 12 2014

When the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision Riley v. California, a Fourth Amendment criminal case, we suspected it would not be

Five lessons for employers from California v. Riley

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

In the waning days of its current term, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in California v. Riley that police officers generally violate the

Supreme Court prohibits warrantless mobile phone searches, underscores individual right to privacy

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 2 2014

The Supreme Court of the United States released a unanimous decision last week barring law enforcement from searching the mobile phones of

Sixth Circuit: “the ‘workplace’ is anywhere that an employee can perform her job duties.”

  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 27 2014

Last month, in EEOC v. Ford Motor Co., the Sixth Circuit held 2-1 that the ADA may require an employer to permit telecommuting as a "reasonable

Telecommuting may constitute a reasonable accommodation under the ADA

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2014

Telecommuting may constitute a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals determined