We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 129

California appellate court tells employers to pay part of employees' cell phone bills or face class action liability

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 2 2014

On August 12, 2014, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, ruled in Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. that employers are

California appeals court requires reimbursement for employee personal cell phones used for work-related calls

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 2 2014

In the case of Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. (Corchran), a California Court of Appeal held that California Labor Code Section 2802 requires

Dropped connection - telecom employee’s ADA claims get hung up in court

  • Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 2 2014

Sometimes, even when an employer offers an ostensibly reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the employee in

Texting for business on personal cell phones

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2014

In the last few years, many industries and companies have been coming to grips with the problems posed by employees using their personal phones

California employers must reimburse employees for mandatory work-related cell phone use

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 26 2014

In a ruling that may spawn a wave of California employment-related class action litigation, a California Court of Appeal has ruled that employers

OSHA guidance on fall protection for Communications Tower employees

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 25 2014

OSHA recently updated its compliance directive and enforcement policy related to safety and health issues associated with work on Communications

BYOD ruling requires employers to reimburse for work-related calls

  • Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2014

How will BYOD other than cell phones be impacted by a California court ruling that "when employees must use their personal cell phones for

On whose dime? Court rules California employers must pay employee cell phone expenses

  • DLA Piper LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2014

In a world where mobile devices outnumber both personal computers and humans, it's not surprising that we use our mobile devices for both business

California appellate court broadly interprets employee reimbursement statute regarding cell phone usage

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2014

Earlier this month a panel of the California Court of Appeals for the Second District issued an opinion concerning Section 2802 of the California

Hold the line: employers on the hook for “reasonable percentage” of personal cell phone expenses if employee uses phone for work

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device ("BYOD") policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. Schwan's Home