We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Privacy: there’d better be an app for That

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 22 2012

App makers who did not heed California Attorney General Kamala Harris's warning that they needed to have a privacy policy accessible from the app should

Court battle over net neutrality likely to resume soon

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2011

The Federal Communications Commission has delivered its net neutrality rule to the Office of Management and Budget and published its assessment of the rule’s paperwork burden in the Federal Register

Cybersquatting update: new protections for brand owners

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 17 2011

Brand owners have recently been given new weapons in the never-ending battle against cybersquatters

Another day, another investigation into Google Street View

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 27 2010

Since May 2007, Google's Street View cars have been roving the world's streets, snapping panoramic pictures of cars, houses, and pedestrians

New law extends disability access requirements to IP-enabled communications

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2010

Earlier this month, President Obama signed the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 into law

Supreme Court takes case on employer monitoring

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 19 2009

The U.S. Supreme Court announced on December 14 that it will review the Ninth Circuit's decision in Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., which held that a government employee and persons with whom he communicated had a reasonable expectation of privacy in personal text messages that were sent and received on an employer-provided pager, despite the employer's express policy that use of its computer network was subject to monitoring