Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 21
Richmond casino case: how early is too early for CEQA?
- Morrison & Foerster LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 15 2010
In Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. City of Richmond, the California Court of Appeal recently held that the City of Richmond’s decision to enter into a Municipal Services Agreement (MSA) with a Native American tribe did not constitute a “project” requiring California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, even though the agreement effectively committed the City to a particular course of action
2010 Minnesota legislative summary
- Larkin Hoffman
- -
- USA
- -
- July 27 2010
Liquor stores may offer tastings of beer and spirits in addition to wine under amendments to Minn. Stat. 340A.419
EPA to assist communities in Sustainable Building Blocks Program
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 11 2011
EPA announced February 3, 2011, that it will work with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Department of Transportation to help communities achieve “sustainable planning” through the Sustainable Communities Building Blocks Program
GSA's green proving ground program
- Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 4 2011
On April 21, 2011, the U.S. General Services Administration ("GSA") announced that it has selected sixteen sustainable building technologies to be tested and evaluated at a number of federal facilities throughout the country
South Carolina Supreme Court expands DHEC's regulatory authority over isolated wetlands throughout the state under the pollution control act
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 23 2011
In the July 2011 decision Georgetown County League of Women Voters v. Smith Land Co., Inc., the South Carolina Supreme Court held that the Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”) has jurisdiction to regulate isolated wetlands under the South Carolina Pollution Control Act, an expansion of DHEC’s regulatory authority over isolated wetlands throughout the State, beyond the eight “coastal zone” counties governed by the coastal management program organized pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act
DDOE issues update on energy star benchmarking regulation
- Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 13 2011
The District of Columbia Green Building Act of 2006 and the Clean and Affordable Energy Act of 2008, which establish the legislative requirements for buildings' environmental performance, require the District government to benchmark energy use for public buildings 10,000 square feet or larger
Despite dismissal, merits of Gifford v. USGBC still being weighed
- Baker & Hostetler LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 29 2011
Because hospitality developers are increasingly being encouraged, and in some cases required, to comply with the LEED rating system, we have been keeping an eye on Gifford v. U.S. Green Building Council
Proposed amendments to the NYC zoning resolution related to parking in the Manhattan core (Community District 1-8)
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 31 2011
The Department of City Planning is proposing to make far-reaching changes to Article I, Chapter 3 of the Zoning Resolution, which governs permitted parking in the Manhattan Core, which is defined as Manhattan south of 96th Street on the East Side and south of 110th Street on the West Side
Corps drops appeal over wetlands rules
- Greenberg Traurig LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 21 2011
As we wrote earlier, in New Hope Power Company and Okeelanta Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers and Steven L. Stockton, U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore of the Southern District of Florida enjoined the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' from enforcing its guidance documents, which modified the Corps's interpretation of its wetlands regulations
Supreme Court opens door to suits challenging federal agency actions
- Polsinelli Shughart PC
- -
- USA
- -
- April 4 2012
On March 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision effectively broadening the circumstances under which parties may go to court to seek review from final agency actions
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Ashlee M Bekish (1)
- Chris M Heffelbower (1)
- Christopher M. Montgomery (1)
- Daniel Phillips (3)
- David A. Gold (1)
- David Leiter (3)
- Martha L. Perkins (2)
- Megan A. Jennings (1)
- Miles H. Imwalle (1)
- Sarah Litke (3)
Firm Name
- Greenberg Traurig LLP (1)
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (1)
- Larkin Hoffman (2)
- Latham & Watkins LLP (1)
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC (4)
- Morrison & Foerster LLP (1)
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP (1)
- Squire Sanders (1)
- Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLP (3)
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP (1)
