Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 22
Supreme Court to address employee privacy
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 14 2009
The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it will review the Ninth Circuit’s 2008 decision on employee privacy in Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co
Supreme Court to review text message privacy case
- Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 22 2009
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case regarding employees' constitutional privacy rights with respect to text messages sent from an employer-paid mobile or pager device
Ru lkin my txt msgs?
- Alston & Bird LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- January 20 2010
"What are the legal boundaries of an employee’s privacy in this interconnected, electronic communication age, one in which thoughts and ideas that would have been spoken personally and privately in ages past are now instantly text-messaged to friends and family via hand-held, computer-assisted electronic devices?"
U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of government employer in workplace electronic monitoring case
- Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 6 2010
In June, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Ontario v. Quon, siding with the City and its officials in a workplace electronic monitoring case closely followed by employers and their counsel
Supreme Court sets oral argument in Quon v. Arch Wireless for April 19, 2010
- Hunton & Williams LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 22 2010
The U.S. Supreme Court has set oral argument for April 19, 2010, to review the Ninth Circuit’s 2008 decision on employee privacy in Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co
Supreme Court to hear argument in employee “sexting” case
- Franczek Radelet PC
- -
- USA
- -
- April 12 2010
On Monday, April 19, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in City of Ontario v. Quon, a case addressing the right of a public employer to review employee text messages on a pager purchased by the public employer for employee business use
Supreme Court recognizes right of public employers to search electronic communications
- Fisher & Phillips LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 17 2010
On June 17, 2010 the US Supreme Court unanimously held that a public employer's search of an employee's text messages was reasonable and did not violate the employee's constitutional rights
Supreme Court opines on employee privacy rights in the workplace
- Fox Rothschild LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 23 2010
On June 17, 2010, in City of Ontario v Quon, the US Supreme Court held that an employer's review of an employee's text messages, sent via an employer-issued pager, did not violate the employee's Fourth Amendment privacy rights
City’s search of text messages was reasonable despite employee’s expectation of privacy
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 8 2010
The City of Ontario’s Computer Usage, Internet and E-mail Policy provides that use of the city’s computers and other electronic equipment, networks, etc., is limited to city-related business, that access is not confidential and “users should have no expectation of privacy or confidentiality when using these resources.”
Fourth Amendment does not violate police-department's search of employee text messages
- Roetzel & Andress
- -
- USA
- -
- June 28 2010
In a previous blog article posted January 8, 2010, Does the Fourth Amendment Protect Text Messages?, we reported that the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in City of Ontario v Quon, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case in which the Circuit Court held that Police Sergeant Quon's Fourth Amendment rights were violated when sexually explicit text messages sent to and from his department-owned pager were accessed by the City
Current Search
- Jurisdiction - USA

- Workarea - Public

- Workarea - Employment & Labor

- Workarea - Information Technology

- Workarea - Litigation

Suggested Facets
Author
- Amy Komoroski Wiwi (1)
- Anthony J. Diana (1)
- Ashlee M Bekish (2)
- Daniel Marx (1)
- Jeff Neuburger (2)
- Jesse Jauregui (1)
- John Kvinge (2)
- Joy N. Eakley (1)
- Michael C. Wilhelm (1)
- Robert G. Young (1)
Firm Name
- Briggs and Morgan (1)
- Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP (2)
- Foley Hoag LLP (1)
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP (1)
- Hunton & Williams LLP (2)
- Larkin Hoffman (2)
- Lowenstein Sandler PC (1)
- Mayer Brown LLP (1)
- Proskauer Rose LLP (3)
- Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP (1)
Jurisdiction
- China (1)
- European Union (1)
- Germany (1)
- Hong Kong (1)
- Indonesia (1)
- Mongolia (1)
- Singapore (1)
- United Kingdom (1)