We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,030

D.C. District Court ruling puts government contractor’s privileged internal investigation reports in jeopardy of disclosure

  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2014

A D.C. District judge recently decided that a government contractor's internal investigation reports into alleged misconduct of its employees are not

ETP v. Enterprise Products: a cautionary tale for prospective joint venturers

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2014

After a lengthy and much-publicized trial, a jury in Dallas, Texas reached a verdict this week that has drawn significant interest from the energy

Appellate Court rules in favor of Saudi Prince in Benedict Canyon case

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 3 2014

In the much publicized case of a Saudi Prince seeking to build his residential estate, a unanimous three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal published

Who pays for new transmission? Supreme Court refuses to decide

  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

On February 24, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court refused to take a case that could have settled the long simmering issue of who should bear the burden of

The U.S. Supreme Court extends Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protections to employees of mutual fund investment advisers and other privately-held contractors to public companies

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

The Supreme Court of the United States on March 4, 2014 held that employees of a privately-held mutual fund investment adviser are protected under a

Ninth Circuit upholds NEPA and NHPA analysis for Hawaii high-speed rail system

  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 26 2014

On February 18, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected challenges under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National

Recent cases address enforceability of teaming agreements

  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 22 2013

Government contracting is a team sport. Even the largest contractors rely significantly upon carefully chosen subcontracting partners to present the

The Supreme Court gives SOX anti-retaliation remedies to lawyers and accountants (and others) who advise public companies

  • Kirkland & Ellis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 10 2014

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), enacted in 2002 in response to the Enron financial scandal, provided that "no public company . . . , or any officer

Utility interference work in New York

  • Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 26 2014

Imagine you are a contractor that has decided to pursue work with the city. You are lucky enough to secure a lucrative contract to upgrade the city's

Who says life’s not fair: good faith and fair dealing prevails in Metcalf case

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2014

In a ruling highly anticipated among government contractors, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held on February 11, 2014