We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 27

No coverage for claim first made prior to inception of claims-made policy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, applying New Hampshire law, has held that no coverage was available for a legal

Malpractice actions by multiple clients for separate services do not constitute related claims

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, has held that four lawsuits alleging legal malpractice arising out of a mass

Seventh Circuit requires notice at early signs of potential suit under “claims made” policy

  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 5 2013

In Koransky, Bouwer & Poracky, P.C. V. The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Co., No. 12-1579, 2013 WL 1296724 (7th Cir. Apr. 2, 2013), the Seventh Circuit

Massachusetts Superior Court holds alleged failure to disclose own mistake is independent grounds for attorney’s liability

  • LeClairRyan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 1 2013

In RFF Family Partnership, LP v. Burns & Levinson, LLP, et al., SUCV2012-2234-BLS1 2012 WL 6062740 (Nov. 21, 2012) (Billings, J.), in connection with

Mississippi court holds no coverage for molestation claim under E&O policy

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

In its recent decision in Tudor Ins. Co. v. Manchester Educ. Found., Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8458 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 22, 2013), the United States

Returning fire: the respondent's brief and several supporting amicus curiae briefs in Gunn v. Minton

  • Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2013

Earlier we reported on both the U.S. Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in the Gunn v. Minton case decided by the Supreme Court of Texas and the

Top 10: "gifts" not to give the plaintiffs' malpractice bar (Part II)

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 28 2012

All of the gift giving this time of year got me thinking about the "gifts" that a plaintiff's malpractice attorney hopes for when making a wish list

Top 10: "gifts" not to give the plaintiffs' malpractice bar (part i)

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 27 2012

All of the gift giving this time of year got me thinking about the "gifts" that a plaintiff's malpractice attorney hopes for when making a wish list

Opening shots in Gunn v. Minton: the petitioner's brief and several amici curiae briefs in support

  • Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 27 2012

Earlier this year we reported on the granting of certiorari for the case of Gunn v. Minton from the Supreme Court of Texas. The case involves a claim of

Billing records and title examination reports held not protected by attorney “work product doctrine” in dispute over time-barred action

  • LeClairRyan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 14 2012

In McCarthy v. lade Associates, Inc., 463 Mass. 181 (2012), the Supreme Judicial Court considered whether files maintained by lawyers representing the plaintiff in an underlying lawsuit must be disclosed in connection with arguments that the plaintiffs’ claims were time-barred. I

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy