We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 93

No coverage for claim first made prior to inception of claims-made policy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, applying New Hampshire law, has held that no coverage was available for a legal

Malpractice actions by multiple clients for separate services do not constitute related claims

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2013

The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, has held that four lawsuits alleging legal malpractice arising out of a mass

Prior knowledge exclusion bars coverage where law firm’s mistake allowed a seller to void client’s deal

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

Applying Indiana law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that no coverage was available for a law firm that failed

Dishonesty exclusion precludes coverage for claim based in part upon knowingly wrongful or fraudulent acts

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2013

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, applying New York law, has held that a dishonesty exclusion precluding

Chiropractor’s failure to warn against sexual assault not "professional services"

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 15 2013

Applying Oklahoma law, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma has determined that a claim against a chiropractor for

Prior knowledge exclusion inapplicable where imputation unavailable

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2013

The United States for the Southern District of Texas, applying Texas law, has held that a professional liability insurer had a duty to defend where

Gunn v. Minton will impact future patent malpractice cases

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

On Jan. 16, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court will revisit a question it has grappled with for almost a century the proper scope of federal court

Coverage barred where claim deemed first made prior to policy’s inception

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 2 2013

Applying Florida law, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has held that a claims-made professional liability policy does

Prior knowledge exclusion does not apply where acts occurred before and after policy period

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 2 2013

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, applying Texas law, has held that a lawyers professional liability policy was

Public policy precludes enforcement of voluntary payments clause in lawyers professional liability policy

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 26 2012

The Appellate Court of Illinois has held that a legal malpractice insurer owed a duty to defend an attorney who admitted to making a mistake in a client's will because a provision of the policy precluding the attorney from admitting liability without consent of his insurer violated public policy