We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,088

PhRMA pushes for permissive off-label promotion regime

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

In light of the decision of 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. Caronia, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) is

Superfund liability for the repair of a useful product

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

A few months ago, I blogged on the decision in Duke Energy Progress Inc. v. Alcan Aluminum Corporation where a court held that a company would not be

Consumer product safety update

  • Tucker Ellis
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

The beginning of 2013 has been filled with significant news in consumer product safety laws. Both in the United States and abroad, manufacturers must

California Governor proposes reforms to Proposition 65, seeks to prevent abuse of statute by "unscrupulous lawyers"

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

California Governor Edmund Brown has added his voice to a number of California legislators calling for an overhaul of the state's Safe Drinking Water

Indiana’s “government compliance” presumption against defect and negligence

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

The Indiana Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion applying the section of Indiana's Product Liability Act (IPLA) that, under certain

Third Circuit upholds dismissal of food labeling false advertising claim based on preemption

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

On May 9, 2013, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a New Jersey District Court's dismissal of plaintiff

Putative class claims “24-hour” makeup does not work

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

A woman who purchased a L'Oréal foundation product advertised to last for 24 hours has sued the company and its parent on behalf of a class of

Court amends order against oil producer, pomace products to be recalled

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

A federal court in New York has amended the preliminary injunction entered against Kangadis Food Inc., doing business as The Gourmet Factory

Interesting consumer protection twist

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Every now and then we come across something new and interesting that, frankly, we hadn't thought of ourselves. That's how we felt when we read the

Athletic training supplement allegedly fails to deliver benefits

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

A California resident has filed consumer fraud claims against the Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., on behalf of a putative statewide class of individuals who