We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 88

Eleventh Circuit reverses decision to exclude plaintiff’s experts

  • Jenner & Block
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

In United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Whirlpool Corp., 704 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2013) (No. 11-15011), the plaintiff insurer brought this appeal from the

The new frontier for insurance: space flight

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

Gov. Martinez emphasized that the legislation still leaves room for injured space flight participants to bring suit, at least in cases where the

Weekly Washington healthcare update

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

Last week, Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Boustany wrote a letter to HHS Secretary Sebelius inquiring about a voter registration

Pennsylvania court holds drywall claims arose out of single occurrence

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 19 2013

In its recent decision in Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Devon International, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20659 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2013), the United States

Pennsylvania courts struggle with insurance coverage for defective product claims

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 28 2013

In 2012, Judge Wettick of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas issued two decisions that have the potential to significantly limit the

Insurance company disputes obligation to provide diacetyl damages or defense

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2013

A company that issued Citrus and Allied Essences Ltd. a commercial umbrella insurance policy in 2006 and 2007 has filed suit in a New York state

Court finds coverage for consequential damages arising from product recall

  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2013

A Minnesota Federal District Court Judge recently ruled that the insured is entitled to defense and indemnification under its commercial liability

Post election update

  • Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 9 2012

The voters have now spoken in one of the most hotly contested and expensive races in American history, and the net effect of countervailing political winds was ironically to perpetuate the political status quo

Product disparagement and "advertising injury": split of authority brewing in the California Court of Appeal?

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2012

A split of authority is brewing the California Court of Appeal regarding the scope of an insurer’s duty to defend an insured against claims of product disparagement under the “advertising injury” provisions of a commercial general liability policy

Proposition 37 presents potential risks for businesses

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2012

On November 6, 2012, California voters will decide Proposition 37, “The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act”

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy