We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 98

Are you covered for food product recalls?

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2014

Food product recalls, whether the result of misbranding, adulteration or another source, are showing no signs of slowing down. According to

11th Circuit holds E&O insurer has duty to defend legionalla claim

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2014

In its recent decision in James River Ins. Co. v. Hufsey-Nicolaides-Garcia-Suarez Associates, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4415 (11th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014

SSL bugs likely to have insurance coverage implications

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 28 2014

The recently publicized Secure Sockets Layer ("SSL") bug affecting Apple Inc. products raises a question regarding insurance coverage that is likely

How insurance works with labeling and duty-to-warn lawsuits

  • Gilbert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 28 2014

Labeling and duty-to-warn cases continue to emerge as a key area of risk for food and beverage companies. In light of this trend, food and beverage

Seventh Circuit says no duty to defend four Loko maker

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2013

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that Phusion Projects' commercial liability insurance carriers have no duty to defend the company

Indalex v. National Union: carving away at Gambone

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 13 2013

In several decisions over the last few years, courts in Pennsylvania haveinappropriately, in this author's viewtaken a narrow view of

General liability insurer must defend manufacturing defect claims; gist of the action doctrine rejected

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 10 2013

A Pennsylvania appellate court in Indalex, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., No. 612 WDA 2012 (Dec. 3, 2013), found that a general liability

Sales of allegedly defective products are not excluded professional services

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 3 2013

Applying California law, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has held that a medical equipment company's sales

Professional services exclusion precludes coverage for design defect claims

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

Applying Nevada law, a federal district court has held that an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify claims alleging damage from design defects

Clarification of the economic loss rule may greatly expand tort claims in construction litigation

  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 31 2013

The economic loss rule is a judicially-created doctrine that sets forth the circumstances under which a tort action is prohibited if the only damages