We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 111

General liability insurers in Pennsylvania required to defend product liability claims

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2014

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has rejected a liability insurer's attempt to overturn a Superior Court decision holding that insurers must defend

Fifth Circuit certifies questions to Texas Supreme Court regarding interpretation of common CGL policy exclusions

  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is looking to the Texas Supreme Court for guidance in interpreting the "your product" and "impaired property"

Court rejects workers comp insurer’s challenge to big pharma

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2014

Pharmaceutical manufacturers that promote off-label uses for prescription drugs have become litigation targets for third-party payorsespecially

Expect focus - volume III, Summer 2014

  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2014

As of May 1, 2014, Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) requires a data breach liability exclusion endorsement to its standard commercial general

23andMe insurer claims no duty to defend company

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

The insurance carrier that issued a "ProductsCompleted Operations Liability and Professional Liability Policy for Life Sciences" policy to 23andMe

Foster Farms sues insurers over definition of “recall”

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

Poultry manufacturer Foster Farms has filed an amended complaint in its lawsuit against its Lloyd's of London insurers, which had rejected its $14.2

Top reasons the JPML has denied centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

Since May 2011, here are the most-cited reasons the JPML has denied Section 1407 centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases: The

Product recall exclusion held not to bar coverage for recall of tainted milk

  • Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 27 2014

On March 18, 2014, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling by a Minnesota federal judge that Main Street Ingredients LLC (Main Street), a

Class action round-up - spring 2014

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2014

In a mortgage-related row, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Central District of California’s grant of summary judgment in favor of several bank

Seeking (and finding) coverage for Proposition 65 claims

  • Gilbert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2014

Navigating California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986better known as Proposition 65is becoming an increasingly