We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Vitaminwater does not just contain vitamins and water. Surprised?

  • MARQUE Lawyers
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

The drink vitaminwater leaves out one key ingredient from its name: sugar. 31 - 32 grams of it per bottle to be exact. In 2009 individuals on behalf

The booming "world wide web" of consumer product safety continues to expand

  • Tucker Ellis
  • -
  • Australia, Canada, European Union, USA
  • -
  • June 19 2012

The “world wide web” of consumer product safety is continuing to expand

A new “world wide web” the sticky implications of consumer product safety regulations in Canada, Australia, the EU and Japan

  • Tucker Ellis
  • -
  • Australia, Canada, European Union, Japan, USA
  • -
  • June 6 2011

With the rise of social media and the Internet, the U.S. has developed www.saferproducts.gov as the public repository for all safety complaints against consumer products

CPSC enters MOU with Australia

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • January 20 2011

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to help reduce the risks of injuries and fatalities associated with consumer products common in the United States and Australia

Canada and Australia consumer product safety laws become effective in 2011

  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • -
  • Australia, Canada, USA
  • -
  • January 6 2011

Entities that manufacture, import, or sell products in the U.S., Canada, and Australia should be aware of new product safety laws that become effective in 2011

U.s. legal commentators consider whether justice is served by putting experts together in a “hot tub”

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • September 16 2010

As courts around the world continue to grapple with the complex technical and scientific issues raised in toxic tort and product liability lawsuits, some U.S. commentators have recently looked to Australia where the “concurrent evidence procedure,” also known as “hot tubbing,” may provide a cost-effective and efficient way for factfinders to sort through the challenging expert witness battles that often confront them