We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,161

Not dead yet Aereo tries to reinvent itself by arguing that it is a cable system entitled to carry television stations pursuant to the statutory license

  • Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

The Supreme Court decision in the Aereo case seemed to be the end of the line for the service that was retransmitting television stations signals

Aereo's cloud of confusion: where to now for cloud computing services?

  • Clayton Utz
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

The recent United States Supreme Court ruling in American Broadcasting Companies v Aereo Inc has raised questions about the legality of some cloud

Duck, duck, goose? No, says the court - Aereo remains yet another duck

  • Dentons
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

Many jurisdictions around the globe face complex questions resulting from the use of new technologies for internet redistribution of over-the-air

Cable and satellite royalty claims due to the Copyright Royalty Board by July 31, 2014

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

This advisory is directed to television stations with locally-produced programming whose signals were carried by at least one cable system located

Cables, antennas and public performance

  • Fennemore Craig
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

Aereo, Inc. provided an Internet service allowing subscribers to watch broadcast television programs on their computer. American Broadcasting Company

The Supreme Court's Aereo ruling: is the sky falling for cloud computing?

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 8 2014

With the Supreme Court's Aereo decision finally out, the digital industry is struggling with its impact, if any, on various products and services

Leveyfilm, Inc. v. Fox Sports Interactive Media, LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 8 2014

Fox Sports Interactive Media, LLC and related entities obtained summary judgment in copyright infringement action brought by owner of photograph used

Laches, statutes of limitations and Raging Bull: the Supreme Court re-emphasizes the pitfalls of delay in copyright cases

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

In Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. __ (2014), the United States Supreme Court addressed the role that the equitable defense of laches

Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc: Supreme Court rules on Raging Bull

  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 7 2014

In the closely followed case involving rights to the acclaimed film Raging Bull, the Supreme Court recently held that laches cannot act as a bar to a copyright plaintiff's claim for infringement damages brought within the copyright statute's three-year limitations window

USA: Supreme Court finds Aereo live streaming service infringes copyright

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 4 2014

The US Supreme Court has delivered its much anticipated ruling in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc., et al. v Aereo, Inc, a case about whether Aereo's