We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,339

The Blurred Lines verdict: could it happen down under?

  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • March 16 2015

The sky is falling in the pop music world following a Los Angeles jury's award of $7.4 million to be paid by Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams to

First-ever award of “any damages” for fraudulent DMCA takedowns under section 512(f)

  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 16 2015

Under section 512(f) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), copyright owners are liable for "any damages" stemming from knowingly false

Songwriter’s Equity Act reintroduced what does it propose?

  • Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 16 2015

The Songwriter’s Equity Act has once again been introduced in Congress (see our article about that Act when it was introduced in the last Congress

Blurred lines in music copyright

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2015

In a landmark US decision, Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams hit Blurred Lines has been found to infringe copyright in Marvin Gaye's 1977 hit Got to

The “Blurred Lines” of copyright law: is Robin Thicke’s song a homage or a copy?

  • HopgoodGanim
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2015

On 10 March 2015, singer Robin Thicke's questionable 2013 hit "Blurred Lines" was found by a federal jury in the US to be a plagiarism of Marvin

“Blurred Lines” copyright infringement update: Marvin Gaye’s estate awarded stunning $7.4 million jury verdict against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams

  • Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2015

In a copyright infringement verdict that has shocked the music industry and raised grave concerns among songwriters, a U.S. District Court jury in Los

Jury finds singers, Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, owe $7.4m for copyright infringement

  • DLA Piper LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 13 2015

On March 10, 2015, a California federal jury awarded Marvin Gaye's children nearly $7.4 million after deciding that pop stars, Pharrell Williams and

Blurred Lines in the difference between copyright in a song and in a recording

  • Law Offices of Marc D. Ostrow
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2015

There’s been a blizzard of articles regarding the jury decision finding that Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams’ 2013 megahit, “Blurred Lines,”

“Blurred Lines” but clear verdict: jury awards Gaye estate $7.3 million in damages for copyright infringement

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2015

In a verdict on March 10, a Los Angeles federal jury decided “Blurred Lines,” written by Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, substantially borrowed

Jury finds Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke guilty of copyright infringement

  • Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2015

On March 20, 2015, a jury awarded $7.4 million to the family of artist Marvin Gaye for Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's alleged infringement of