We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
A federal court in California has dismissed a class action lawsuit against Taco Bell alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, ruling that an advertiser is not vicariously liable under the statute for text message campaigns carried out by agencies on its behalf unless the advertiser controls the manner and means of the campaign
A federal court in California has dismissed a class action lawsuit against Taco Bell alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), ruling that an advertiser is not vicariously liable under the statute for text message campaigns carried out by agencies on its behalf unless the advertiser controls the manner and means of the campaign
In the days and weeks since the Federal Trade Commission amended the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Parts 310.1-.9, adding specific provisions to govern for-profit debt relief providers (the “TSR Amendments”), there have been many discussions among industry professionals about possible exceptions, or “loopholes,” to the TSR Amendments
