We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 341

North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. Fox News Network LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 16 2015

In copyright infringement action involving allegations that Fox News posted to its Facebook page plaintiff's 911 photograph of firefighters raising

Corbello v. Devito

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 16 2015

Ninth Circuit reverses and remands district court's grant of summary judgment to members of "Four Seasons" music group and others involved in

Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 9 2015

District court dismisses breach of contract and breach of guaranty claims against Warner Bros. Based on Oscar-winning motion picture Gravity, holding

Latele TV, C.A. V. Telemundo Communications Group, LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 9 2015

District court declines to decide substantial similarity issue at summary judgment stage, deferring to jury question of whether similarities between

Siegel, et al. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2009

District court holds that plaintiffs, heirs of one of the co-creators of the Superman character, successfully terminated certain prior grants in copyrights and recaptured the rights to several Superman-related works from the 1930s and 40s, including portions of Superman comic books and two weeks’ worth of daily newspaper strips; however, the court ruled that the remaining Superman material at issue in the litigation was created as a work made for hire under the Copyright Act of 1909, and that ownership of such material remains solely with defendants

Warren Publishing Co., et al. v. Spurlock

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 12 2009

District court grants summary judgment holding that defendant’s reproduction of several graphic works, originally used as monster magazine covers by plaintiff, in a book retrospective of an artist’s career is a fair use based on finding that defendant’s use is transformative because the purpose of a retrospective of an artist’s work has a different purpose than magazine covers that are intended to sell copies of the magazine

Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

U.S. Supreme Court finds FCC's indecency rulings regarding isolated utterances of profanity and brief depictions of female anatomy to be unconstitutionally vague and a violation of due process

Agence France Presse v. Morel

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • France, USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

District court upholds jury's award of maximum statutory copyright damages of $1.2 million, plus $20,000 in DMCA damages, finding sufficient evidence

Davis v. Electronic Arts Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

Ninth Circuit affirms district court's denial of EA's anti-SLAPP motion, finding that EA did not show probability of prevailing on its incidental

Psenicska v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2009

The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of plaintiffs’ consolidated action for fraud and other claims against the producers of the movie Borat, because plaintiffs signed consent agreements to appear in the film and disclaimed any reliance on defendants’ oral representations about the nature of the film