We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 333

Psenicska v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2009

The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of plaintiffs’ consolidated action for fraud and other claims against the producers of the movie Borat, because plaintiffs signed consent agreements to appear in the film and disclaimed any reliance on defendants’ oral representations about the nature of the film

Mil-Spec Monkey, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2014

District court grants summary judgment in favor of publisher of military-action video game Call of Duty: Ghosts on trademark infringement claims

Stan Lee Media, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company - USCA, Tenth Circuit, December 23, 2014

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 9 2015

Tenth Circuit dismisses Stan Lee Media’s copyright infringement claim against Disney, finding that plaintiff was collaterally estopped from asserting

Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

U.S. Supreme Court finds FCC's indecency rulings regarding isolated utterances of profanity and brief depictions of female anatomy to be unconstitutionally vague and a violation of due process

Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2013

Ninth Circuit affirms district court order denying motion to strike, under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, right-of-publicity claims asserted by

Bissoon-Dath v. Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 2 2012

Following dismissal of plaintiffs’ copyright claims alleging that defendants misappropriated their works to develop the video game God of War, district court denies defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees, concluding that plaintiffs' claims were not frivolous and that attorneys’ fees would not serve the purpose of the Copyright Act

Amber Coyle v. Michael O’Rourke

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

Plaintiff models sue defendants in California state court for statutory invasion of privacy and common law misappropriation, and, following removal

Davis v. Electronic Arts Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

Ninth Circuit affirms district court's denial of EA's anti-SLAPP motion, finding that EA did not show probability of prevailing on its incidental

Rather v. CBS Corporation, et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2009

New York appellate court orders dismissal of all of Dan Rather’s claims against CBS and Viacom, including breach of contract and fraud, relating to CBS’s removal of Rather as anchor following the broadcast of a program about President Bush’s service in the Texas Air National Guard

Henley v. Devore

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 24 2010

Court grants summary judgment on copyright infringement claims by plaintiffs, holders of copyrights in the songs “The Boys of Summer” and “All She Wants to Do Is Dance,” which were the basis for songs used by defendants without authorization in political campaign ads; court grants summary judgment for defendants on plaintiff’s Lanham Act claims