We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-2 of 2

Grocers' revenue-sharing deal deserves more than a quick look, Ninth Circuit holds

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 2 2011

A revenue-sharing agreement among grocery stores, designed to help the stores weather targeted strikes by employees during labor strife, is not shielded from antitrust scrutiny by virtue of the non-statutory labor exemption, but neither is it so obviously anticompetitive to merit condemnation under a "quick-look" analysis, an en banc panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court recently held

NFL fans - are you ready for some... antitrust litigation? Players sue, claiming lockout is a group boycott

  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2011

Following a breakdown in labor negotiations, a group of current and prospective NFL players have sued the league, claiming that a league-imposed lockout is a group boycott among horizontal competitors (the NFL teams), and a per-se violation of Section One of the Sherman Act