We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,857

Inevitable disclosure of trade secrets is not an independent cause of action in Georgia

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

In Holton v. Physician Oncology Servs., LP, No. S13A0012, 2013 WL 1859294 (Ga. May 6, 2013), the Georgia Supreme Court held that Georgia law does not

Ohio Supreme Court holds mortgage servicing not subject to Consumer Sales Practices Act

  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 14, the Ohio Supreme Court held in response to two certified questions from a federal district court that the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices

Enforceable contract or unenforceable agreement to agree? The importance of specificity in teaming agreements

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

A recent case from the Eastern District of Virginia provides another reminder that teaming agreements subject to Virginia law must include specific

SEC officer director bars: by what standard?

  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Sometimes it can be difficult to determine if you actually won. This may be the case for the SEC with the Second Circuit's ruling in SEC v. Bankosky

Superfund liability for the repair of a useful product

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

A few months ago, I blogged on the decision in Duke Energy Progress Inc. v. Alcan Aluminum Corporation where a court held that a company would not be

ACC opposes proposed registration requirement for in-house lawyers with out-of-state licenses practicing in Washington

  • American Health Lawyers Association
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) submitted April 26 a comment letter to the Washington Supreme Court urging it to reject proposed

Delaware Supreme Court affirms reformation of LLC agreements but reverses award of attorneys' fees - law firm was working for free

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Last year the Delaware Court of Chancery reformed the cash distribution waterfall provisions of three real estate joint venture LLC agreements

Implied warranties in a service contract?

  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Cargill, Inc. v. Ron Burge Trucking, Inc. addresses the issue of whether the implied warranties that exist in a contract for the sale of goods also

Recent trends in M&A and corporate fiduciary litigation

  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

With capital markets reaching new heights and the accelerating pace of announced mergers and going private transactions, litigation filed by

Colorado Supreme Court reverses Court of Appeals' interpretation of Colorado trust fund statute

  • Otten Johnson Robinson Neff & Ragonetti
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Approximately two and a half years ago, I wrote about a broad interpretation placed on the Colorado trust fund statute by the Colorado Court of