We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 9,507

Subject matter support in design continuation applications: In re Owens decision provides new guidance

  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2013

On March 26, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the U.S. Patent Office's rejection of the claim of a design patent

Innovator liability theory gets traction in the Northern District of Illinois

  • Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 17 2014

In Dolan v. Smithkine Beecham Corp. (N.D. Ill 2014), Judge Zagel of the Northern District of Illinois just held that a brand name drug manufacturer

Motion to exclude advice of counsel granted where defendant sought to rely on pre-investigation advice on cease and desist letter while preventing discovery of advice

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2013

Volterra Semiconductor ("Volterra") filed a motion to prevent Primarion from offering evidence regarding the subjective prong of the Seagate test on

Northern exposure?

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada, USA
  • -
  • April 4 2013

Davit Akman and John Norman suggest that a recently commenced investigation into alleged "product switching" and statements by the Interim

Accused activities occurring outside the United States found insufficient to support a finding of infringement

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2013

Patent infringement is governed by section 271(a), which applies only to activity "within the United States." Courts often face the question of

Recent developments relating to patent term adjustment

  • Baker Botts LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2013

Recent case law and changes to the America Invents Act (AIA) have impacted how the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) calculates Patent Term

Federal Circuit finds patent marking is circumstantial evidence of infringement

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2013

In Frolow v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., the Federal Circuit refused to adopt the doctrine of marking estoppel, but held that evidence that Wilson had

Motorola v. Apple: judge postpones Markman and orders Motorola and Apple to clean up their own mess

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2013

As the litigation between Motorola and Apple rages on throughout the country, one judge has had enough of an ever increasing number of claims and

Oakley Inc. v. Hire Order, Ltd.

  • OBLON
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2013

In Oakley Inc. v. Hire Order, Ltd. (3:12-cv-02346-DMS-WMC), the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of California issued an Order on March

ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-877) regarding Certain Omega-3 Extracts From Marine Or Aquatic Biomass

  • OBLON
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2013

On April 11, 2013, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing their vote to institute an investigation of Certain