We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 7,662

ALJ Gildea rules on motions in limine in Certain Microelectromechanical Systems (“MEMS Devices”) (337-TA-876)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 11 2014

On February 11, 2014, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public versions of Order No. 62 and No. 63 in Certain Microelectromechanical Systems ("MEMS

Supreme Court ruling redefines the standard for proving inducement of patent infringement

  • Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 2 2011

On May 31, 2011, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., No. 10-6, 2011 WL 2119109 that redefines what is necessary to establish a claim for inducement and clarifies the language of 271(b

Anti-GMO groups ask Supreme Court to reconsider standing to bring declaratory judgment action against GMO patent holder

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 19 2013

Recently, a group of 73 organic and conventional farmers, seed businesses, and public advocacy groups petitioned the Supreme Court to review the

Multi-defendant troll suits to drive joinder filings at PTAB

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2013

Inter partes reviews (IPRs) are now understood to be effective tools for parties defending against patent infringement suits filed by non-practicing

Green Edge Enterprises, LLC v. Rubber Mulch Etc., LLC

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 23 2010

Despite patentee’s failure to identify the accurate trade name or product code of a preferred product, a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding failure to satisfy best mode if one of ordinary skill in the art could have discovered the preferred product

EDTX denies plaintiff's MIL seeking to exclude settlement demands made in other negotiations

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 19 2013

On November 13, 2013, Judge Caldwell of the Western District of Pennsylvania issued an order in Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. First Quality Baby

Proof that the claimed invention worked is required for reduction to practice

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 30 2011

In reviewing a district court action under 35 USC 146 subsequent to an interference decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that the district court may take new evidence and determine priority de novo

Rovi files new 337 complaint regarding certain products containing interactive program guide and parental control technology

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2012

On May 1, 2012, Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., Rovi Technologies Corporation, Starsight Telecast, Inc., and United Video Properties, Inc.all of Santa Clara, Californiaand Index Systems, Inc

ALJ Essex issues notice of initial determination in certain devices for improving uniformity used in a backlight module (337-TA-805)

  • Oblon Spivak LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2012

On October 22, 2012, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued a notice regarding the Initial Determination on Violation in Certain Devices For Improving Uniformity Used In A Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-805

Lexicography may not override ordinary meaning in the absence of clear disclaimer

  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 26 2014

Because the district court erred in claim construction, the Fed. Cir. Vacates both its denial of infringement summary judgment and its grant of