Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 43

When it rains, it pours: court grants plaintiff fees, interest, doubles damages, and supplemental damages

The Alps South court found for Plaintiff on every damages-related post-trial issue after the jury found the patent valid and willfully infringed

As a Defendant, think long and hard about whether to use a damages expert when the patentee has been precluded from presenting a reasonable royalty

The court in Nano-Second ruled an assignment must contain an express provision allowing the assignee to sue for infringement occurring prior to the

The Avocent court considered a variety of challenges to Plaintiff’s damages evidence, including late disclosure of damages-related fact testimony and

The AIA limited claims arising from “false marking.” Nonetheless, the marking statute tripped up Plaintiff in Kimberly-Clark Worldwide. As to some of

The "unruly" arising-under doctrine of federal jurisdiction is in a state of "general confusion," according to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court

While a damages expert is not required, proof of the amount of damages is necessary. Unicom learned this lesson the hard way when it failed to meet

The Bosch court reasonably concluded that details relating to the calculation of a patent owner’s reasonable royalty and lost profits damages were

Damages experts are always “on the record.” While it may have been a close call for the court, the testimony of Defendant’s damages expert that a

The Flatworld court ordered Apple to produce documents relating to royalty claims in cases where Apple was asserting its patents. The case is a