We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 84

Not-so-expert options? Daubert challenges abound in Apple Inc. v. Motorola , Inc

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 29 2014

Are we experiencing a "damages free-for-all," or is it "business as usual" with damages opin- ions? The spike in challenges to damages experts has

Easing "exceptional case" Supreme Court agan relaxes Federal Circuit rules

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 30 2014

Once again easing a "rigid" Federal Circuit standard, the U.S. Supreme Court has relaxed "exceptional case" standards in the district court and on

EMVR's night of the living dead? EMVR affects damages post-LaserDynamics

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2014

Just when you thought the "entire market value rule" (EMVR) was decapitated, its presence rears its head. In LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer

New 'belief' defense to induced infringement: fixing what isn't broken?

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 16 2013

Perhaps believing can make it so, at least according to the Federal Circuit's latest ruling regarding induced infringement and invalidity. In

Taking exception to "exceptional case"? Supreme Court scrutinizes rules

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2013

Tough "exceptionality" standards embedded in "exceptional cases" rules will be under the U.S. Supreme Court's microscope. If the Court eases these

Keeping the door ajar? Federal Circuit says "it ain't over 'til it's over"

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 30 2013

In a patent infringement lawsuit, when are final rulings "final"? Even the Federal Circuit is struggling with when to call a halt to all the fun

Comparable licenses do the job

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2013

The Warsaw Orthopedic court offers a common sense solution to a discovery dispute: When truly comparable licenses related to the specific technology

Strike one expert report but not out

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2013

Dynetix teaches us that it pays to know the law of patent damages. The district court granted Defendant’s motion to strike the damages report when

Using marking defense precludes pre-suit damages

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2013

A license and a covenant-not-to-sue proved to be Plaintiff’s undoing when the U.S. Ethernet Innovations court decided sales by two large companies

‘Delayed’ marking defense erased

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 3 2013

The Grand Overseas court rejected a motion based on 287(a), holding that Plaintiff’s delay in marking and use of adhesive labels were not fatal to