We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Is a mortgage lender that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of a "financial institution" itself a "financial institution" for purposes of federal criminal bank fraud?
When a bank sues to recover an overdraft created by a Nigerian-style email scam, which party has the burden of proof on the question of whether, in the context of section 3406 of the Commercial Code, the bank acted negligentlythe bank or the overdraft account holder?
