We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Third Circuit adopts substantial compliance test for contempt of diet supplement ad order

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 11 2010

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed and remanded a district court determination that a dietary supplement maker did not violate a consent order with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC

New Jersey Supreme Court faults trial court’s class-certification analysis in consumer-fraud action

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2010

The New Jersey Supreme Court has reversed lower court rulings denying a motion to certify a statewide class of consumers who purchased a dietary supplement that allegedly fails to deliver its promised benefits

First Circuit upholds $48 million award for deceptive infomercials promoting dietary supplements

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 28 2010

The First Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a multi-million dollar award in the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's) lawsuit against the producer and distributor of infomercials for dietary supplements that could purportedly cure everything from cancer, obesity and Parkinson's disease to multiple sclerosis, heart disease and lupus

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy