We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 332

Amber Coyle v. Michael O’Rourke

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

Plaintiff models sue defendants in California state court for statutory invasion of privacy and common law misappropriation, and, following removal

Davis v. Electronic Arts Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 12 2015

Ninth Circuit affirms district court's denial of EA's anti-SLAPP motion, finding that EA did not show probability of prevailing on its incidental

Stan Lee Media, Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company - USCA, Tenth Circuit, December 23, 2014

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 9 2015

Tenth Circuit dismisses Stan Lee Media’s copyright infringement claim against Disney, finding that plaintiff was collaterally estopped from asserting

Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2013

Ninth Circuit affirms district court order denying motion to strike, under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, right-of-publicity claims asserted by

Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

U.S. Supreme Court finds FCC's indecency rulings regarding isolated utterances of profanity and brief depictions of female anatomy to be unconstitutionally vague and a violation of due process

Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. Hotfile Corp., et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 27 2011

District court dismisses plaintiff motion picture companies’ claim for direct copyright infringement against defendant file-sharing site and its operator on defendants’ motion to dismiss, but allows plaintiffs’ claim for secondary infringement to stand against both corporate and individual defendants

Agence France Presse v. Morel

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • France, USA
  • -
  • August 18 2014

District court upholds jury's award of maximum statutory copyright damages of $1.2 million, plus $20,000 in DMCA damages, finding sufficient evidence

Mil-Spec Monkey, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2014

District court grants summary judgment in favor of publisher of military-action video game Call of Duty: Ghosts on trademark infringement claims

Psenicska v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 25 2009

The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of plaintiffs’ consolidated action for fraud and other claims against the producers of the movie Borat, because plaintiffs signed consent agreements to appear in the film and disclaimed any reliance on defendants’ oral representations about the nature of the film

CBS Broadcasting, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 19 2012

District court denies CBS’s request for temporary restraining order enjoining production and broadcast of ABC’s reality show The Glass House, holding that CBS could not establish likelihood of success on claims of copyright infringement and specifically finding that CBS would have difficulty establishing that ABC had misappropriated protectable elements from CBS’s Big Brother