We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 135

Dunn v. DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of defendant DreamWorks Animation on plaintiff’s breach of implied-in-fact contract claim

Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc, et al v. Fung, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 20 2010

In copyright infringement action against operator of BitTorrent websites, court grants summary judgment to plaintiff movie studios on liability for inducement to infringe

Beholder Productions, Inc. v. Catona, et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2009

The court granted summary judgment for defendants, dismissing plaintiff’s copyright infringement suit

UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., et al.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2009

Defendant Veoh operates an Internet-based service that allows users to share videos with others

Milne, et al. v. Stephen Slesinger, Inc.

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2009

The district court grants Disney’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing Slesinger’s copyright, trademark and trade dress infringement claims relating to the Winnie the Pooh characters; the court also grants Disney’s motion for summary adjudication of Slesinger’s claims based on judicial estoppel

The Weinstein Company v. Smokewood Entertainment Group, LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2009

In a breach of contract action, the district court grants defendant producer’s motion to dismiss claims by The Weinstein Company, holding that parties’ oral negotiations for licensing and distribution rights to the motion picture Push, allegedly confirmed by an email exchange, do not constitute a writing that satisfies Section 204 of the Copyright Act

Arista Records LLC, et al. v. Lime Group LLC, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 19 2010

In copyright infringement action against distributors of peer-to-peer file sharing program, court grants plaintiff record companies' motion for summary judgment on their claims of inducement to infringe, common law copyright infringement, and unfair competition

Tiffany (NJ) Inc v eBay Inc

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 7 2010

Second Circuit affirms district court judgment in favor of eBay on Tiffany’s direct and contributory trademark infringement and dilution claims based on eBay’s alleged facilitating and advertising of the sale of “Tiffany” goods that turned out to be counterfeit, and remands the false advertising claim because the court was unable to affirm on the record before it that eBay’s advertisements related to the sale of Tiffany goods on its website were not likely to mislead or confuse consumers

Young v. Wideawake Death Row Entertainment, LLC

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 16 2010

District court grants motion to dismiss Lanham Act and right of publicity claims in action brought by Dr. Dre against company that re-issued his recorded works without his permission

William A. Graham Co. v. Haughey, et al

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 19 2010

Court holds that prejudgment interest is appropriate in this case because it provides full compensation to the plaintiff and acts as a deterrent to willful copyright infringement; court calculates prejudgment interest from the date the infringement began, not the date plaintiff learned of the infringement