We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 57

Google enters into multi-state wi-fi settlement

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2013

On March 12, 2013, Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen announced that a coalition of 38 states had entered into a $7 million settlement with

Massachusetts court ruling benefits plaintiff in zip code case

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2013

On March 11, 2013, in Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc., the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court effectively reinstated the suit against the retailer

Supreme Court finds lack of standing to challenge Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 1 2013

On February 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court decided in Clapper v. Amnesty International that U.S. persons who engage in communications with

California ruling finds Song-Beverly Act does not apply to online transactions

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 5 2013

On February 4, 2013, the Supreme Court of California examined whether Section 1747.08 of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act ("Song-Beverly") prohibits

California ruling permits collection of ZIP codes after receipt is provided to customer

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2013

As reported in BNA's Privacy & Security Law Report, on December 14, 2012, a federal district court in California ruled that a retail store's policy

California AG sues delta for failure to post a privacy policy on its mobile app

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2012

On December 6, 2012, California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris announced a lawsuit against Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) for violations of the California Online Privacy Protection Act (“CalOPPA”

Sixth Circuit finds coverage for losses resulting from retailer's data breach

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2012

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently held that losses resulting from the theft of customers’ banking information from a retailer’s computer system are covered under a commercial crime policy’s computer fraud endorsement

Sixth Circuit finds coverage for losses resulting from retailer’s data breach

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 4 2012

On August 23, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Retailer Ventures, Inc. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. that losses resulting from the theft of customers’ banking information from a retailer’s computer system are covered under a commercial crime policy’s computer fraud endorsement

California court denies Hulu’s motion to dismiss in video privacy protection act case

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2012

On August 10, 2012, a federal district court in California denied Hulu’s motion to dismiss the remaining claim in a putative class action suit alleging that the online streaming video provider transmitted users’ personal information to third parties in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”

Litigation hold notices in light of Apple v. Samsung

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2012

On July 25, 2012, in the case of Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al., the Magistrate Judge, Paul S. Grewal, for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, issued an order granting Apple’s motion for an adverse inference jury instruction based on the court’s finding that Samsung did not suspend its automatic biweekly destruction of emails from its email system, that Samsung failed to issue sufficiently distributed litigation hold notices after it admitted the litigation was “reasonably foreseeable” and failed to follow up on such hold notices, and that Samsung failed to monitor its employees in their preservation efforts, to ensure compliance with the hold notices

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy