Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-2 of 2
Generic drug manufacturers and failure to warn: what duty is there after Pliva v. Mensing?
- Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 27 2011
The Supreme Court ruled on June 23, 2011, that generic drug manufacturers cannot be sued for a failure to warn under state tort law, as long as their labeling complies with the FDA mandated labeling for the innovator drug product
A Matrixx Revolution, Part II: Supreme Court affirms Ninth Circuit's holding that life science companies cannot rely on a statistical significance standard when deciding whether adverse event reports are material for the purpose of securities disclosures
- Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 29 2011
On March 22, the US Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc v Siracusano, 09-1156
