We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,769

Ashley II holdings require caution

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

On April 4, 2013, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a much anticipated decision in PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Ashley II of Charleston LLC, No

2013 - the year California finally reins in the excesses and abuses of Prop 65?

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

It looks like Governor Jerry Brown is taking on Prop 65 in an effort to make California more business friendly, and put a limit on frivolous

California Governor proposes reforms to Proposition 65, seeks to prevent abuse of statute by "unscrupulous lawyers"

  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

California Governor Edmund Brown has added his voice to a number of California legislators calling for an overhaul of the state's Safe Drinking Water

Ninth Circuit holds agencies cannot amend rules through court settlements

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2013

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated a consent decree that provided a remedy in a challenge to the Northwest Forest Plan (NFP), a forest

EPA has no mandatory duty to find that lead emissions from general aviation gasoline cause or contribute to air pollution

  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

Recently, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held in Friends of the Earth v. EPA, D.D.C., No. 12-363, that the Environmental

Prop 65 reforms proposed

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 8 2013

Our readers know how Prop 65 has created numerous issues for product sellers and created much litigation mischief in the hands of overzealous

D.C. Circuit affirms listing of polar bear as “threatened” under Endangered Species Act

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 7 2013

After losing at the district court level, various industry groups, environmental groups, and states appealed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's

Industry and environmental groups challenge new rules for commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators

  • Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

Petitions have been filed in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, challenging EPA rules, finalized in December, for

CERCLA liability - current owner's inaction bars liability defense

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

On April 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a bona fide prospective purchaser's (BFPP) inaction with respect to

Federal Court of Appeals addresses Superfund liability of brownfield developers

  • Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 6 2013

In a case of first impression regarding brownfield developer liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act