We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 116

Surprising but welcome: California federal court finds that botched cleanup may create CERCLA liability for California's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 23 2014

In California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Jim Dobbas, Inc., et al, 2014 WL 4627248 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2014), the United States

Indiana challenges EPA carbon rules

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

Indiana and 11 other states have launched a preemptive strike on the EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan. The EPA proposed the Clean Power Plan on June

Indiana ethanol plants escape stricter standards

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2014

On Sept. 2, 2014, the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed a trial court's decision that the Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") did

Court holds that EPA not required to regulate AFO emissions under Clean Air Act

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 24 2014

On June 28, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not impose a nondiscretionary

7th Circuit Court departs from 9th Circuit ruling in subrogation suit

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2014

Recently, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois found that Section 107(a) does create a right to subrogation. Departing from

Guidance on seeking coverage for environmental liabilities provided in recent opinion

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

In a recent opinion, the Indiana Court of Appeals examined and provided significant analyses of a number of fundamental concepts in insurance law

Subrogation and CERCLA cost recovery: 7th Circuit Court refuses to adopt 9th Circuit ruling in Chubb

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

Subrogation has been defined as "the substitution of one person in the place of another with reference to a lawful claim, demand or right, so that he

Indiana Court of Appeals issues opinion providing guidance on seeking coverage for environmental liabilities

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

In a recent opinion, the Indiana Court of Appeals examined and provided significant analyses of a number of fundamental concepts in insurance law

Supreme Court limits scope of CERCLA pre-emption

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 16 2014

On June 9, the U.S. Supreme Court held in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger et al. that CERCLA Section 9658 does not pre-empt state statutes of repose. This

United States Supreme Court keeps insurance company from seeking recovery of payments under CERCLA claim

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2014

The United States Supreme Court recently refused to review a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision barring an insurer's attempt to seek recovery