We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 97

Is gasoline a defective product? Jury hits Exxon Mobil with $236 million verdict

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2013

After losing a nearly three-month trial to the tune of $236 million, Exxon Mobil Corp. ("Exxon") will appeal the jury verdict issued in the New

Bona fide prospective purchaser defense rejected by Fourth Circuit because purchaser did not exercise appropriate care after closing

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 8 2013

An owner of real property claiming the bona fide prospective purchaser (BFPP) defense under Section 107(r)(1) of CERCLA has the burden of

NPDES permit not required for certain discharges of stormwater runoff

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

On March 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court held that discharges of channeled stormwater runoff from logging roads were exempt from the

SCOTUS finds certain discharges of stormwater runoff exempt from NPDES permitting

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 28 2013

On March 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court held that discharges of channeled stormwater runoff from logging roads were exempt from the

Environmental legal action statute of limitations: 7th Circuit adds another wrinkle

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2013

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the Indiana ten-year "catch-all" statute of limitations may apply to environmental legal

Federal court tosses San Diego’s $250 million Qualcomm Stadium groundwater contamination lawsuit

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2013

Nothing serves as a death knell for lawsuits in federal court more often than exaggerated claims propped up by wobbly expert testimony. This rang

Challenge to EPA's non-road engine emissions rules denied as time-barred

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 24 2013

On January 15, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the American Road and Transportation Builders

Stormwater flow not a “pollutant” under Clean Water Act and EPA may not regulate it as a surrogate, federal court holds

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 8 2013

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently granted judgment on the pleadings against EPA and held that EPA lacked the

PRP letter triggers insurer's duty to defend

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 7 2013

One of your most valuable rights under an insurance policy is having your insurance company defend you from a covered claim, no matter how frivolous. This

Indiana Court of Appeals issues decisions interpreting liability under Environmental Legal Action Statute

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 20 2012

On October 22, 2012, in Richmond Center, LLC v. Deutz Corporation (No. 89A01-1109-PL-416), Indiana's Court of Appeals clarified Indiana's Environmental