We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 107

United States Supreme Court keeps insurance company from seeking recovery of payments under CERCLA claim

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2014

The United States Supreme Court recently refused to review a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision barring an insurer's attempt to seek recovery

Court clarifies pleadings requirements for CERCLA Section 112(c) subrogration claims

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2014

The Eastern District of California recently examined the sufficiency of an insurer's complaint for subrogation against two potentially responsible

Claims dismissed by adjacent landowner for alleged methane contamination

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2014

In Magers v. Chesapeake Appalachia, 2013 WL 4099925 (Aug. 13, 2013) (N.D. W.Va.), Judge Stamp granted defendant CNX Company's motion to dismiss

High Court agrees to review EPA's greenhouse gas rule

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2013

On October 15, 2013, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case reviewing EPA's greenhouse gas rule for stationary sources. Following the Supreme

Preemption argument asserted by power generator rejected by Third Circuit

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2013

The Third Circuit recently held that the Clean Air Act ("CAA") does not preempt state common law actions against polluters. In Bell v. Cheswick

Third Circuit rejects preemption argument asserted by power generator

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2013

The Third Circuit recently held that the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) does not preempt state common law actions against polluters

Nuisance class action against hog farm decertified because of highly individualized elements of proof under Kentucky law

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2013

On August, 2, the Western District of Kentucky decertified a plaintiff class after concluding that the highly individualized proof necessary to

Mindful of manure: federal court decides cow pies could be regulated waste

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2013

In June 2013, the Eastern District of Washington federal court denied a motion to dismiss filed by a group of dairy farmers who were sued by the

SCOTUS to review decision invalidating CSPAR

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2013

EPA's petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit's decision invalidating the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

EPA v. Eight is Enough: West Virginia Federal Court to rule on EPA's attempt to regulate poultry farm

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

On June 14, 2012, Lois Alt ("Alt"), the owner of Eight is Enough, a small poultry farm in Old Fields, West Virginia, filed suit against the United