We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 112

7th Circuit Court departs from 9th Circuit ruling in subrogation suit

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2014

Recently, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois found that Section 107(a) does create a right to subrogation. Departing from

Guidance on seeking coverage for environmental liabilities provided in recent opinion

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

In a recent opinion, the Indiana Court of Appeals examined and provided significant analyses of a number of fundamental concepts in insurance law

Subrogation and CERCLA cost recovery: 7th Circuit Court refuses to adopt 9th Circuit ruling in Chubb

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2014

Subrogation has been defined as "the substitution of one person in the place of another with reference to a lawful claim, demand or right, so that he

Indiana Court of Appeals issues opinion providing guidance on seeking coverage for environmental liabilities

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2014

In a recent opinion, the Indiana Court of Appeals examined and provided significant analyses of a number of fundamental concepts in insurance law

Supreme Court limits scope of CERCLA pre-emption

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 16 2014

On June 9, the U.S. Supreme Court held in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger et al. that CERCLA Section 9658 does not pre-empt state statutes of repose. This

United States Supreme Court keeps insurance company from seeking recovery of payments under CERCLA claim

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2014

The United States Supreme Court recently refused to review a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision barring an insurer's attempt to seek recovery

Court clarifies pleadings requirements for CERCLA Section 112(c) subrogration claims

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2014

The Eastern District of California recently examined the sufficiency of an insurer's complaint for subrogation against two potentially responsible

Claims dismissed by adjacent landowner for alleged methane contamination

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2014

In Magers v. Chesapeake Appalachia, 2013 WL 4099925 (Aug. 13, 2013) (N.D. W.Va.), Judge Stamp granted defendant CNX Company's motion to dismiss

High Court agrees to review EPA's greenhouse gas rule

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2013

On October 15, 2013, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case reviewing EPA's greenhouse gas rule for stationary sources. Following the Supreme

Third Circuit rejects preemption argument asserted by power generator

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 16 2013

The Third Circuit recently held that the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) does not preempt state common law actions against polluters