Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Communities for a Better Environment v. City of Richmond: climate change mitigation measures do not stand muster under CEQA
- Alston & Bird LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 15 2010
In Communities for a Better Environment v. City of Richmond, the California Court of Appeals overturned an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the retrofitting and expansion of an oil refinery
Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles, (2d Dist., Nov. 9, 2011) Cal.App.4th (Case No. b231965)
- Alston & Bird LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 22 2011
In Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v
Sacketts v. United States EPA: the U.S. Supreme Court rules that EPA compliance orders for violation of the Clean Water Act are judicially reviewable
- Alston & Bird LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 21 2012
Today, the United States Supreme Court, in Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, held that a compliance order issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) was a “final agency action” under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and was judicially reviewable as the CWA does not preclude judicial review under the APA
Karuk Tribe of California v. U.S. Forest Service: consultation with wildlife agencies required for mining activities to proceed pursuant to a notice of intent
- Alston & Bird LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- June 4 2012
On June 1, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal ruled that the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires the U.S. Forest Service to consult with federal wildlife agencies prior to allowing mining activities to proceed under a Notice of Intent (NOI) in critical habitat of a listed species
