We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 91

When is a private project a public work for prevailing wage application in California?

  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

In recent years, the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"), the Legislature and the California courts have expanded the application of the

NLRB posting requirement struck down by court; federal contractors still on the hook

  • Thompson Coburn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

On May 7, 2013, the D.C. Circuit vacated a National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") rule that would require most private sector employers

NLRB posting still required for federal contractors

  • Thompson Coburn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 20 2013

On May 7, 2013, the D.C. Circuit vacated a National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") rule that would require most private sector employers

Bayh-DoleAact does not automatically vest title to federally funded inventions in federal contractors

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 26 2011

In Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., No. 09-1159 (U.S. June 6, 2011), the Supreme Court held that the University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act of 1980 (the “Bayh-Dole Act” or “Act”) does not automatically vest title to federally funded inventions in federal contractors or authorize contractors to unilaterally take title to such inventions

Who’s a government subcontractor now?

  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2013

Much has been written lately about the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruling in UPMC Braddock v. Harris where three hospitals

State FCA developments

  • Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 23 2013

On February 19, 2013, a California appellate court held that a qui tam relator may contact current employees of the defendant in a California False

Supreme Court decision: board of trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 7 2011

In its decision announced yesterday in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 563 U.S. ___ (2011), the Supreme Court clarified the ownership of inventions resulting from research funded by the U.S. government

OFCCP continues its fight for jurisdiction over TRICARE health care provider

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 21 2012

On October 19th, 2012, the Administrative Review Board (ARB) determined that the Department of Labor's (DOL) Office of Federal Contract Compliance

Stanford v. Roche: highlighting the importance of best practices for employee assignments

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 21 2011

On February 28, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Case No. 09-1159, wherein the parties sparred over the scope of a federal contractor university's statutory right to elect to retain title to a "subject invention" under the Bayh-Dole Act, 35 U.S.C. 200-212

Indirect cost and profit recovery for increased wages

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 7 2011

The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals last month issued an important decision permitting broad recovery under the contract Changes clause for a construction contractor performing a contract subject to the Davis-Bacon Act

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy