We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 17,149

Wake up it’s time to get paid

  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

California employers must pay workers for “all hours worked,” the state’s highest court recently determined, ruling that 24-hour security guards must

California sunshine warms the market: a twist on customer non-solicitation provisions in the Golden State

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

Those of you reading our Employee Mobility blog posts are familiar with California's unique approach to non-compete agreements: they are, except in a

The companionship exemption remains: D.C. District Court’s most recent decision in Home Care Association of America v. Weil marks second victory for home care employers

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

On January 14, 2015, Judge Richard J. Leon of the D.C. Federal District Court issued another favorable opinion for home care employers by vacating a

D.C. Circuit caps NLRB’s overly zealous policing of Section 7 rights

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

On January 16, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit gave a victory, of sorts, to an employer concerning company hats and uniforms. The

Man claiming hand scanning time clock causes “Mark of the Beast” wins religious discrimination suit

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 23 2015

Last week, a federal jury in West Virginia found in favor of a plaintiff claiming that his coal mining employer discriminated against him based on

NJ Supreme Court considers breadth of state whistleblower protections for “watchdog” employees

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

The New Jersey Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday, January 20, in the closely watched case, Lippman v. Ethicon, Inc., addressing the scope

California Supreme Court decision barring waiver of representative claims is left intact by U.S. Supreme Court

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review the California Supreme Court's decision that representative claims under the California Labor Code

New Jersey Supreme Court adopts restrictive test for “independent contractor” status

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently adopted a new test making it more difficult for New Jersey employers to classify workers as independent

DC Circuit puts on its thinking cap when addressing NLRB ruling on hat restrictions

  • Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently struck a blow for employer’s rights to regulate headgear

New Jersey Supreme Court embraces worker-friendly test for determining employee or independent contractor status

  • DLA Piper LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2015

Employers should note a recent decision from the Supreme Court of New Jersey regarding the proper test to apply when determining an individual's