We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 15,850

Court upholds jury verdict that EEOC is not entitled to award of putative damages

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

On August 21, 2014, in the case EEOC v. Swissport Fueling, Inc., Case No. CV-10-02101-PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. Aug. 21, 2014) (a case we previously blogged

California Supreme Court limits employment claims against franchisors

  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

In an acknowledgment of the modern reality of the franchise business model in California, and indeed in the United States, the California Supreme

Restrictive covenants: better to ask and disclose

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

When recruiting an executive, or when being recruited, it is best practice for the future employer, the employee and any executive recruiting firm

Ninth Circuit upholds “right to control” as primary test of independent contractor or employee status

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

On August 27, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld California's long-standing reliance on the "right to control" test as the

Alabama court of civil appeals issues two important workers’ compensation opinions about future medical care and treatment

  • Sirote & Permutt PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

I will be speaking at the Alabama Workers' Comp Conference on September 19 at the Birmingham Hilton. The speakers include Alabama Court of Civil

Is the EEOC off the rails with this new “wellness” lawsuit? Don’t think so.

  • Constangy Brooks & Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2014

Last week, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit against Wisconsin-based Orion Energy Systems, Inc., over its wellness program and

California Court of Appeals holds that employees must be reimbursed for using personal cell phones for work-related calls

  • Epstein Becker Green
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service Inc., the California Court of Appeals posed the following question: "Does an employer always have to reimburse an

California Supreme Court: holding franchisor liable as employer depends on level of control over day-to-day employment decisions

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

On August 28, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued a decision holding that a franchisor that did not exhibit the characteristics of an

California legislative update: August 2014

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In August 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a number of bills that will impact the employer community. A brief summary of these

California court interprets vague language in arbitration agreement in favor of employee

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2014

In a recent decision, a California Court of Appeal held that an employer cannot compel arbitration of a wage claim when the language in the parties’