We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 17,820

Pregnancy: employers’ newest “accommodation obligation”

  • Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

A divided U.S. Supreme Court decided last week that employers covered by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (part of Title VII) may be required to make

FMLA same sex spouse rule: enjoined

  • Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The new DOL same-sex rule that took effect this week under the Family and Medical Leave Act has been temporarily halted from enforcement. On March 26

Background check suits: whole foods class action to continue

  • Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

In a previous blog I discussed the multiple class actions that are pending and which address the issue of the Fair Credit Reporting Act requirements

Tip-sharing lawsuit in Birmingham allegedly settled

  • Sirote & Permutt PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

According to Al.com, a lawsuit filed in January against a Hooters restaurant in Birmingham has been resolved, pending court approval. The lawsuit was

Employment flash - March 2015

  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected the Sixth Circuit’s presumption of lifetime vesting for retiree health care benefit provisions in collective

Supreme Court reinstates pregnancy discrimination claim against UPS

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court on March 25, 2015, vacated a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision and revived a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit brought

The Supreme Court weighs in on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act providing guidance to employers and protections for pregnant workers

  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The Supreme Court has recently issued an important opinion, Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., clarifying the protections afforded by the Pregnancy

The EEOC snares a $12.2 million settlement in Colorado, representing more than half the $22.5 million the EEOC recovered in the entirety of FY 2014

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 31 2015

The EEOC recently announced reaching its largest settlement in the last 2 years in EEOC v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Co. LLC, No. 15-CV-600 (D. Colo

United States Supreme Court issues ruling regarding treatment of pregnant employees

  • Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

On March 25, 2015, in Young v. United Parcel Service, the United States Supreme Court held that under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), a

Circuit court decision denying employer’s motion to dismiss complaint alleging violations of the Florida Whistleblower Act (“FWA”) shows effect of the split between 4th DCA and 2nd DCA

  • Berger Singerman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 30 2015

On March 25, 2015, the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida denied a motion to dismiss an employee’s complaint