We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,263

The Fisker case and its impact on distressed M&A

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

As is well known, the right to credit bid is the entitlement of a secured lender to bid the amount of its outstanding claims at the sale of its

Controlling stockholder squeeze-outs may be structured to achieve deferential business judgment rule under Delaware law

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

In Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corp. (Del. Mar. 14, 2014), the Delaware Supreme Court recently decided that a going private transaction sponsored by the

Thoughts on the most recent Delaware decisions: part II guidelines for controlling shareholders, special committees, and investment bankers

  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 14 2014

Recent Delaware court decisions underscore the importance of adherence to well-established practices and procedures by all participants in

California Legislature restores and expands qualified small business stock incentives

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2014

As of January 2014, the California Legislature has restored and increased opportunities for investors to defer or exclude gains from the sale of

Thoughts on the most recent Delaware decisions: part I issues for controlling shareholders, special committees, and investment bankers

  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 11 2014

The recent Delaware decisions in Orchard and MFW have been characterized by some as "gamechanging" for controlling shareholders and boards. Our view

Third Circuit holds that FLSA liability can be imposed on successor company

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has concluded that a successor employer could be held liable for Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA

M&A and breach of contract claims

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2014

A recent case from the Delaware Court of Chancery, ENI Holdings, LLC v. KBR Group Holdings, LLC, C.A. No. 8075-VCG (Del. Ch. Nov. 27, 2013), has

Delaware Court issues additional guidance on financial advisor conflicts

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2014

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently found Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) liable for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duties in connection

Making “material adverse change” mean what you choose it to mean neither more nor less

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2014

A recent decision by the Court of Chancery of Delaware provides a reason to pause before agreeing to standard, boilerplate "material adverse change"

Private equity firms face potential liability under plant closing laws

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 9 2014

View the full issue (PDF) IN THIS ISSUE Private Equity Firms Face Potential Liability Under Plant Closing Laws Incentivising Management Across the