We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 908

New 35 USC 101 Guidance: "significantly different" is the test for determining patent eligibility of claims appearing to be drawn to judicial exceptions

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 5 2014

Effective March 4, 2014 the USPTO Patent Examining Corps is instructed to follow a new procedure "in determining whether a claim reflects a

Advertisers may want to think twice before congratulating a celebrity

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 4 2014

In a recent decision, the recent Seventh Circuit evaluated the inherent conflict between an athlete's right of publicity and the protections of the

Court rules cheerleading uniform designs not copyrightable; Sixth Circuit has chance to weigh in

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 14 2014

The Sixth Circuit has an opportunity to consider the copyrightability of clothing design elements. A federal court in Tennessee recently held that

Foreseeability does not bar the doctrine of equivalents, including for means-plus-function limitations

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 19 2014

In the recent Ring & Pinion Service Inc. v. ARB Corp. decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the foreseeability of an

Google, Viacom settle copyright infringement dispute that centered on DMCA ‘safe harbor’ provision

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 20 2014

Viacom has settled its seven-year copyright dispute with Google over the posting of tens of thousands of unauthorized video clips on YouTube. The

Supreme Court decides scope of standing for false advertising claims

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 25 2014

After hearing arguments in December 2013, the Supreme Court has decided a three-way split amongst the United States Courts of Appeal regarding the

Spring update: more lessons learned from the new post-grant proceedings

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 27 2014

The new post-grant proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), contesting the validity of issued patents, have been in effect

Denise DeFranco provides an analysis of the Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Labs U.S. Supreme Court decision

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 29 2012

The Supreme Court of the United States recently issued its decision in the case Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Labs

Bill Lewris examines follow-on biologics: an overview and comparison of the 2010 biologics price competition and innovation act and the hatch-waxman act

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 3 2011

Biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are awaiting the FDA's new regulations for implementing the 2010 Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which will aim to provide an expedited approval framework for follow-on biologics

Podcast: Erika Arner discusses Bilski, one year later

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2011

A year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited Bilski v. Kappos ruling