We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 937

IPRPGR proceedings: litigation or prosecution?

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2013

IPRPGR proceedings share many similarities with other trial proceedings, such as district court proceedings. Like other traditional trial

Lessons learned from early decisions declining to institute an IPR

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2013

The PTAB has denied petitions for inter partes review in five of its 54 institution decisions (as of April 30, 2013

Assuaging estoppel concerns: defining "real parties in interest" after the AIA

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 30 2013

The newly passed America Invents Act (AIA) raised fears among co-defendants in patent infringement lawsuits about the potentially broad scope of the

PTAB denies authorization to file motion to disqualify district court counsel from IPR

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 29 2013

In ScentAir Technologies, Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., IPR2013-00179 (JL), Paper 9 (April 16, 2013), the Board denied ScentAir's request to file a motion

Last month at the Federal Circuit - April 2013

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2013

In Move, Inc. v. Real Estate Alliance Ltd., No. 12-1342 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2013), the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's decision granting

What information will the USPTO allow to be sealed during an IPR

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 24 2013

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a decision addressing the treatment of confidential information submitted during an inter partes

ITC podcast: Smith Brittingham and Mareesa Frederick on best practices for litigating at the ITC

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 18 2013

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has become a key destination for both domestic and foreign intellectual property litigants. ITC cases

District court stays four cases pending PTAB review of CBM patents

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 17 2013

Earlier today, Judge Pearson of the Northern District of Ohio stayed four co-pending district court cases involving patents subject to a number of

Limits on discovery in IPRs: no fishing expeditions for information relating to infringement

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 15 2013

Recent inter partes review (IPR) orders confirm that the scope of discovery in IPR is significantly narrower than the broad-ranging discovery

Suppliers may ask courts to rule that they do not indirectly infringe patents when they have agreed to supply an allegedly infringing product even before their customers have had an opportunity to directly infringe the patents

  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2013

The Declaratory Judgment Act permits a court to rule on the rights and other legal relations of parties when there is an actual "case or controversy"

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy