We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,009

Contemporary clothing’s “Look” collides with Title VII

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2014

There is more than a little bit of irony when a clothing company with a target market of teens and young adults has a fashion dilemma. However, a

Seventh Circuit warns intervenors not to sleep on their rights

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2014

It’s an ancient principle of equity, drawn from Roman law: Equity relieves the vigilant, not those who sleep upon their rights. And it sums up quite

Federal Circuit judges disagree on use of post filing date evidence of nonobviousness

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 21 2014

On October 20, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued an order denying the petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed in Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. v

Mais reversed: if you give me your number, I can call it, however I want.

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 1 2014

“If you give me your number, I can call it, however I want.” For more than twenty years this statement has summarized the Federal Communications

Federal Circuit jurisdiction over patent contract disputes

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 9 2014

In a precedential order issued in Jang v. Boston Scientific Corp., the Federal Circuit held that it has jurisdiction over the parties' patent-related

Hurry up and wait: court decision gives no substantive guidance on the EEOC’s challenges to standard separation agreement provisions

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2014

As we noted last month, a federal district court in Illinois announced it was dismissing a controversial lawsuit brought by the EEOC against a

Myriad set for another round

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2014

On Monday October 6th, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will entertain oral argument in another case involving Myriad's BRCA1BRCA2

Attorneys' fees awarded to small business patent owner to advance considerations of "compensation and deterrence"

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 8 2014

A recent case in the District of Connecticut demonstrates that courts may be more willing to award attorneys' fees to a small plaintiff, encouraging

Take care to avoid reverse discrimination claims

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2014

Most discrimination cases involve claims that an employer discriminated against a minority employee on account of race, against a foreign employee

Seventh Circuit uses Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5) to reopen 23-year old judgment

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 9 2014

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) allows a party to move for relief from a final judgment on the ground that "it prospectively is no longer