We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 958

Auto makers flatten patent troll

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2013

On August 9, 2013 the Federal Circuit decided Taurus IP, LLC v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16507 (Court of Appeals, August 9, 2013

Cherry-picking: 7th Cir. Criticizes lawyers' summary-judgment practice

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2014

Two weeks ago, in an order given wide publicity nationally, federal District Judge Mark Bennett of the Northern District of Iowa issued sanctions in

First post grant review petition shows that amending claims is not child's play

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 11 2014

The first Post Grant Review petition visible to the public was filed August 5, 2014, against U.S. Patent 8,684,420. The patent was granted from an

Federal Circuit finds that FDA citizen petition could give rise to antitrust liability

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

In Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., the Federal Circuit remanded-in-part for the district court to determine whether

Sarbanes-Oxley casts a wide net, literally

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

Congress passed Sarbanes-Oxley in 2002 to deal with the accounting scandals that resulted in the downfall of the likes of Enron, Tyco, Worldcom

Managing IP risk in the age of personalized medicine

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 6 2014

As discussed on Foley's Health Care Law Today blog, personalized medicine treatment trends and innovations are leading diagnostic and therapeutic

Got (raw) milk? How about jurisdiction? Something's sour in the raw-milk case

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 8 2014

Yesterday, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals released its unpublished opinion in Farm-To-Consumer v. Wis. DATCP, 11AP2264, a closely watched case

Commission tightens rules of exemption under the EU De Minimis safe harbor

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • European Union, USA
  • -
  • August 6 2014

On June 25, 2014, the European Commission (Commission) adopted revised rules on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict

No coach necessary for potty-mouth employee

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 28 2014

As we have recently noted, and as many employers have probably bemoaned a time or two, sometimes it feels like the legal concept of "reasonable

“Qualified written request” under RESPA no “magic” words, but the right questions must be asked

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 4 2013

For the first time, the federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently opined on what constitutes a "qualified written request" under the