Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 159

Pre-issuance information relevant to royalty damages

In Philippi, the court concluded that, while pre-issuance sales and marketing data was relevant to royalty damages and was thus discoverable, it was

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a dispute over allegedly false statements about patents did not raise a substantial question

Apple successfully limited the Plaintiff’s damages period to the date of reissue in NetAirus by relying on 35 U.S.C. 252. But, the court also said

Applying the notion that rejecting expert testimony is the exception rather than the rule, a magistrate judge in Alexam encouraged vigorous

In Fujitsu Limited, the court followed case law and precluded a foreign parentsole patent holder from recovering lost profits for sales lost by a

Global Traffic Technologies teaches us that courts lean toward vigorous cross-examination rather than exclusion when damages experts are subject to a

In Promega Corp. Judge Posner reminds us that attention to detail in opinions and resisting the temptation to overreach by damages experts is crucial

RAND royalties are retaking center stage as a standards rule. In a 200-plus-page opinion tackling SSOs, SEPs, and RAND obligations, the district

There is no substitute for a considered and complete approach to reasonable royalty damages. Ericsson Inc. v. D-Link Corp., confirms this in the

Confirming a long-standing rule, Federal Circuit Chief Judge Rader decided the district court clearly erred when it left room for the infringer to