We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 2,210

Tension between private AG law and mandatory arbitration heats up in California

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 13 2013

American Lawyer senior writer Alison Frankel reports on a recent California appellate court ruling that "just made a high-stakes debate at the state

SCOTUS grants cert. on Lanham Act standing for false advertising claims

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 13 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to review whether an entity may bring a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act against a defendant that

Supreme Court remands two class actions in light of Comcast

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 12 2013

Earlier this week I spoke at a CLE seminar on the topic of class actions, and part of my focus was the recent Supreme Court decision in Comcast Corp

Pre-judgment interest awarded at court’s discretion

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

Don’t neglect pre-judgment interest when figuring your damages. If you miss making a sound case for this element, your final award might be less than

More may be less in Daubert motion before bench trial

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

It’s unclear that this case dealt with damages experts, but it is worth noting. Remember, judges are people, too. Faced with 1,600 pages of

Pre-issuance information relevant to royalty damages

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

In Philippi, the court concluded that, while pre-issuance sales and marketing data was relevant to royalty damages and was thus discoverable, it was

Joint employer liability does not extend to co-employer’s illegal deductions

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

The Westin hotel recently avoided joint employer liability where its co-employer staffing agency illegally deducted immigration fees from employee

Judge “gets it” separate trial on post-injunction damages denied

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

In Synqor, a defendant’s attempt to distance itself from other defendants prior to a trial on post-injunction damages came up short when the

Committee approves amendments to civil rules

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 8 2013

Earlier this month, the Federal Courts' Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure approved for publication a package of proposals that would, if

Suit filed in California over Hepatitis A outbreak linked to frozen organic fruit

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 7 2013

A California resident has filed a strict liability lawsuit against a food retailer and the Oregon-based company that produced a frozen organic fruit