We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 182

Supplier sentenced for illegal sales of non-approved drugs

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 26 2014

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, a federal court in Virginia has sentenced a U.S. citizen, who owned and operated several companies in

New infringement lawsuit filed to protect BRCA1 and BRCA2 patents

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 26 2014

Myriad Genetics has brought a new infringement lawsuit against a company offering a next-generation sequencing test that analyzes the BRCA1 and BRCA2

USPTO proposes changes to patent term adjustment

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 26 2014

In response to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Novartis AG v. Lee, summarized in Issue 71 of this Bulletin, the U.S. Patent and

Federal court upholds FTC rules on reporting certain pharma patent transfers

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 12 2014

Granting the agency's motion for summary judgment, a federal court in the District of Columbia has upheld the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's

Federal Circuit explores when litigation is “reasonably foreseeable” for spoliation purposes

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 19 2011

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has issued rulings in companion patent-infringement cases involving the alleged spoliation of documents; at issue was a determination as to when litigation is "reasonably foreseeable," thus triggering a document-preservation duty

Federal Circuit addresses personal jurisdiction in patent infringement litigation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2012

Finding that the U.S. Supreme Court “has yet to reach a consensus on the proper articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory” of personal jurisdiction to assess whether a court has jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a patent infringement suit, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has applied its own theory, which assesses the pleadings and evidence under “any articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory,” and has determined that a district court in Wyoming properly dismissed two patent infringement lawsuits for lack of jurisdiction

Federal Circuit rules on zero damages and standard-essential patents

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2014

In a closely watched case, a divided Federal Circuit Court of Appeals panel has determined that U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Posner, presiding as a

Class action filed against 23andMe, Inc. over efficacy of home DNA test kits

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2014

A New Mexico resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against 23andMe, Inc., alleging that claims for its DNA Collection Kits&mdash

Myriad Genetics brings new BRCA1BRCA2 infringement suits

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 12 2013

Myriad Genetics now reportedly has six pending infringement lawsuits involving its BRCA1 and BRCA2 patents, with Invitae Corp. and Laboratory Corp

Long-running GORE-TEX graft patent dispute fractures Federal Circuit panel

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 1 2012

A divided Federal Circuit Court of Appeals panel has upheld a jury verdict of patent validity and willful infringement and affirmed a district court’s decision to enhance the damages verdict, thus upholding an award in excess of $371 million and an additional award of $19 million in costs and attorney’s fees