We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 182

Court orders dispute over 23andMe DNA test kits to arbitration

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

A multidistrict litigation court in California has ordered false-advertising, class-action claims filed against personal genetics company 23andMe to

Patent damage awards studied

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

Legal analytics firm Lex Machina has issued a "Patent Litigation Damages Report" that analyzes patent litigation damages awarded in U.S. district

Challenge to AIA first-to-file rule fails for lack of standing

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

Ruling that it had jurisdiction to consider a constitutional challenge to the America Invents Act (AIA), the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has

Federal court enjoins enforcement of Massachusetts opioid regulations

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

A federal court in Massachusetts has issued a preliminary injunction in a challenge to the Commonwealth's regulation of a specific opioid

County pharmaceutical disposal law at issue before Ninth Circuit

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has heard oral argument in an appeal challenging an Alameda County, California law that requires pharmaceutical

New infringement lawsuit filed to protect BRCA1 and BRCA2 patents

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 26 2014

Myriad Genetics has brought a new infringement lawsuit against a company offering a next-generation sequencing test that analyzes the BRCA1 and BRCA2

Class action filed against 23andMe, Inc. over efficacy of home DNA test kits

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2014

A New Mexico resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against 23andMe, Inc., alleging that claims for its DNA Collection Kits&mdash

Federal Circuit rules on zero damages and standard-essential patents

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2014

In a closely watched case, a divided Federal Circuit Court of Appeals panel has determined that U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Posner, presiding as a

Federal Circuit addresses personal jurisdiction in patent infringement litigation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2012

Finding that the U.S. Supreme Court “has yet to reach a consensus on the proper articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory” of personal jurisdiction to assess whether a court has jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a patent infringement suit, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has applied its own theory, which assesses the pleadings and evidence under “any articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory,” and has determined that a district court in Wyoming properly dismissed two patent infringement lawsuits for lack of jurisdiction

Federal court upholds FTC rules on reporting certain pharma patent transfers

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 12 2014

Granting the agency's motion for summary judgment, a federal court in the District of Columbia has upheld the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's