We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 186

23andMe insurer claims no duty to defend company

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2014

The insurance carrier that issued a "ProductsCompleted Operations Liability and Professional Liability Policy for Life Sciences" policy to 23andMe

Court orders dispute over 23andMe DNA test kits to arbitration

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

A multidistrict litigation court in California has ordered false-advertising, class-action claims filed against personal genetics company 23andMe to

Class action filed against 23andMe, Inc. over efficacy of home DNA test kits

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 30 2014

A New Mexico resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against 23andMe, Inc., alleging that claims for its DNA Collection Kits&mdash

Guilty plea entered in cancer-drug smuggling operation

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 21 2014

The owner of an Istanbul, Turkey-based pharmaceutical company has pleaded guilty in a Missouri federal court to charges that he shipped illegal

County pharmaceutical disposal law at issue before Ninth Circuit

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has heard oral argument in an appeal challenging an Alameda County, California law that requires pharmaceutical

Challenge to AIA first-to-file rule fails for lack of standing

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2014

Ruling that it had jurisdiction to consider a constitutional challenge to the America Invents Act (AIA), the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has

Federal Circuit explores when litigation is “reasonably foreseeable” for spoliation purposes

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 19 2011

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has issued rulings in companion patent-infringement cases involving the alleged spoliation of documents; at issue was a determination as to when litigation is "reasonably foreseeable," thus triggering a document-preservation duty

Federal Circuit applies pre-AIA law to rule it lacked jurisdiction to hear appeal

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2013

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that the law in effect before the America Invents Act (AIA) was enacted applied to a dispute

Supplier sentenced for illegal sales of non-approved drugs

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 26 2014

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, a federal court in Virginia has sentenced a U.S. citizen, who owned and operated several companies in

Federal Circuit rules on zero damages and standard-essential patents

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2014

In a closely watched case, a divided Federal Circuit Court of Appeals panel has determined that U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Posner, presiding as a