Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 100
Putative class alleges pharma statements about new drug violated securities laws
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 16 2013
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and several of its executives have been targeted in a securities class action filed in a federal court in Massachusetts
Federal Circuit addresses pleading standards for patent infringement claims
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 2 2013
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a federal district court erred by relying on an incorrect pleading standard in dismissing
SCOTUS unanimously rules GM soybean patent infringed
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 16 2013
The U.S. Supreme Court has determined that the "exhaustion doctrine" does not apply in the context of a patented genetically modified (GM) seed, and
Federal Circuit issues seven opinions on patentability of software innovations
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 16 2013
The en banc Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has divided over whether method and computer-readable media claims and system claims are directed to
Life Tech shareholder sues to stop $13.6 billion sale to Thermo Fisher
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 2 2013
According to a news source, Life Technologies shareholder Chang Choi has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a class of company shareholders alleging breach
Federal Circuit reminds litigants to cross-appeal patent invalidity claim
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- March 21 2013
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, in the context of patents on improvements to electronic animal collars, has in large part affirmed a lower
French company prevails in dispute with FDA over drug-classification ruling
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 3 2012
A federal court in the District of Columbia has determined that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) erred when it classified a combination drug-device product as primarily a drug, thus subjecting its French manufacturer to more burdensome regulatory requirements
Location of outside patent counsel may not subject company to state jurisdiction
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 20 2012
A federal court in Massachusetts has dismissed a suit seeking a declaration of non-infringement filed by a Massachusetts company against a Texasbased company, finding that the defendant lacked sufficient contacts with Massachusetts to allow the court to exercise jurisdiction over it
Monsanto Co. wins patent infringement claims against GE soybean farmer
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- October 7 2011
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that farmers who plant the progeny of genetically engineered (GE) soybean seeds protected by U.S. patents have infringed those patents even where the progeny are derived from commodity seed purchased from a grain elevator
Federal Circuit addresses personal jurisdiction in patent infringement litigation
- Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 30 2012
Finding that the U.S. Supreme Court “has yet to reach a consensus on the proper articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory” of personal jurisdiction to assess whether a court has jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a patent infringement suit, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has applied its own theory, which assesses the pleadings and evidence under “any articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory,” and has determined that a district court in Wyoming properly dismissed two patent infringement lawsuits for lack of jurisdiction
Current Search
- Jurisdiction - USA
- Workarea - Litigation
- Firm Name - Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
- Author - Thomas T. Moga
- Author - Madeleine McDonough
- Author - Chris A. Johnson