We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Toxic tort: pet owners sue flea and tick product manufacturers in putative class action

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2010

Seven pet owners have filed a putative class action against manufacturers of flea and tick products, seeking damages and a recall of the allegedly dangerous products

Hair product distributor settles California AG’s enforcement action over VOC content for $1.2 million

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 26 2010

A hair product distributor has reportedly settled for $1.2 million an enforcement action brought by the California Attorney General’s (AG’s) office

Prop. 65: lawsuit targets fish oil supplements containing PCBs

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2010

Environmental and public health groups have sued eight manufacturers and retailers of fish oil supplements sold in California under the state Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65) alleging that the fish oil supplements contain high levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) and require warning labels

Prop. 65: California sues bounce house manufacturers over lead content

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 20 2010

California Attorney General Jerry Brown (D) has sued nine manufacturers of vinyl bounce houses under the state’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Prop. 65), alleging failure to provide a lead and lead compounds exposure warning